Numbers 32 1

Numbers 32:1 kjv

Now the children of Reuben and the children of Gad had a very great multitude of cattle: and when they saw the land of Jazer, and the land of Gilead, that, behold, the place was a place for cattle;

Numbers 32:1 nkjv

Now the children of Reuben and the children of Gad had a very great multitude of livestock; and when they saw the land of Jazer and the land of Gilead, that indeed the region was a place for livestock,

Numbers 32:1 niv

The Reubenites and Gadites, who had very large herds and flocks, saw that the lands of Jazer and Gilead were suitable for livestock.

Numbers 32:1 esv

Now the people of Reuben and the people of Gad had a very great number of livestock. And they saw the land of Jazer and the land of Gilead, and behold, the place was a place for livestock.

Numbers 32:1 nlt

The tribes of Reuben and Gad owned vast numbers of livestock. So when they saw that the lands of Jazer and Gilead were ideally suited for their flocks and herds,

Numbers 32 verses

Numbers 32 1 Meaning

The verse indicates that the tribes of Reuben and Gad possessed an extraordinarily large quantity of livestock. Upon observing the lands of Jazer and Gilead, located in the Transjordanian region, they determined that these areas were exceptionally suitable for their extensive herds due to their rich pastures, leading to their desire to settle there.

Numbers 32 1 Context

Numbers 32:1 serves as the crucial opening to a pivotal narrative segment. Immediately following the conclusion of battles against Midian and the census (Num 31), the Israelites are poised to enter the Promised Land of Canaan (west of the Jordan). This verse sets the stage for the controversial request from the tribes of Reuben and Gad (and later, half of Manasseh) to inherit land east of the Jordan, instead of crossing into the primary inheritance.

Chapter 32 details the initial desire of these tribes, Moses' immediate concern that their request would weaken the resolve of the other tribes—recalling the rebellion at Kadesh-Barnea—and the subsequent negotiation. The agreement reached allows them to settle Transjordan, but only after they promise to send their fighting men ahead of the other tribes to help conquer Canaan. Historically, this allocation would set the Transjordanian tribes somewhat apart, influencing their later experiences, including their vulnerability to foreign incursions due to their geographical position. Culturally, their motivation stemmed from practical economic needs: their large herds required vast and fertile pasturelands, which Jazer and Gilead notably provided.

Numbers 32 1 Word analysis

• Now (וְ, ve): A simple conjunctive particle "and," here functions narratively as "now" or "and it came to pass," introducing a significant turn in the story that directly links to Israel's preparations for the Promised Land.
• the people of Reuben (בְּנֵי רְאוּבֵן, bəney Rəʼūḇēn) and the people of Gad (וּבְנֵי גָד, ūḇəney Gāḏ): Denotes specific tribal groups, descendants of Jacob's sons Reuben and Gad. Reuben, the firstborn, lost his birthright due to moral failing (Gen 49:4), and his tribe often struggled for prominence. Gad's tribe also contributed to Israel's military strength but was often associated with nomadic practices. Their joint decision underscores a shared practical concern.
• had (הָיָה לָהֶם, hāyāh lāhem): Literally, "there was to them" or "belonged to them," emphasizing possession.
• a very great multitude of livestock (מִקְנֶה רָב מְאֹד, miqneh rav mĕʼōḏ):
  • Miqneh (מִקְנֶה): Means "livestock" or "acquired property," indicating their primary form of wealth and sustenance. This highlights their pastoral economy.
  • Rav mĕʼōḏ (רָב מְאֹד): Translates to "much, very much" or "a great multitude," emphasizing the sheer abundance of their herds. This makes their need for expansive grazing land understandable from a pragmatic standpoint.
• and they saw (וַיִּרְאוּ, vayyirʼū): The verb "saw" implies more than just casual observation. It suggests active perception, examination, and evaluation leading to a deliberate realization and desire. In biblical narrative, "seeing" often precipitates significant actions or decisions, both positive and negative (e.g., Eve "saw" the tree, leading to sin; David "saw" Bathsheba, leading to adultery). Here, it leads to their specific request.
• the land of Jazer (אֶת־אֶרֶץ יַעְזֵר, ʼet-ʼereṣ Yaʻăzer) and the land of Gilead (וְאֶרֶץ גִּלְעָד, wəʼereṣ Gilʻāḏ): Specific geographical regions east of the Jordan River. Both were renowned for their fertile lands and excellent pastures. Gilead, in particular, was famous for its rich resources and healing balm (Jer 8:22), indicating prime grazing ground. Their naming confirms a deliberate assessment of these particular territories.
• and behold (וְהִנֵּה, wəhinnēh): An interjection that draws immediate attention to the following statement, signaling a key realization or significant finding by the tribes. It functions like "and lo!" or "and indeed."
• the place was a place for livestock (הַמָּקוֹם מְקוֹם מִקְנֶה, hammāqōm mĕqōm miqneh): The repetition of "place" (מָקוֹם, māqōm) strongly emphasizes suitability and ideal fit. It's not merely a location but the ideal location specifically for their miqneh (livestock). This phrase clearly articulates their pragmatic reasoning and the specific nature of their attraction to these lands.

Numbers 32 1 Bonus section

• The detail of "very great multitude of livestock" indicates substantial accumulated wealth, which could be seen as a blessing from God, yet it also presents a potential temptation for prioritizing material comfort over the collective, covenanted calling to inherit the land on the west side of Jordan.
• The phrase "they saw the land" contains a subtle echo of earlier biblical narratives where what is "seen" becomes the object of desire and a catalyst for crucial decisions, for better or worse.
• The request from these tribes reflects a genuine concern for their economic viability, but it introduces a deviation from the established expectation that all tribes would cross the Jordan and jointly conquer the heart of Canaan. This pragmatic choice of land ultimately influenced the future geopolitical landscape and vulnerabilities of Israel.
• The placement of this verse is strategic, coming immediately after instructions for dividing the land among the tribes in Canaan (Num 26:52-56) and Moses' final preparations. It directly challenges the assumed unified progression into the central Promised Land.

Numbers 32 1 Commentary

Numbers 32:1 acts as the critical opening to a significant episode detailing a test of faith, unity, and covenant commitment for the Israelite nation. The prosperity of the tribes of Reuben and Gad, evident in their vast livestock, forms the practical basis for their distinct request for land. Their deliberate "seeing" and recognition of Jazer and Gilead as ideal pastures highlights human pragmatism and economic considerations impacting spiritual direction. This initial observation of fertile lands sparks a desire that would necessitate negotiation and a reaffirmation of their commitment to the greater communal mission of conquering the divinely promised land west of the Jordan. It foregrounds the tension between immediate, personal interest and the overarching divine plan, setting the stage for Moses' pastoral discernment and the ultimate compromise.