Numbers 20 21

Numbers 20:21 kjv

Thus Edom refused to give Israel passage through his border: wherefore Israel turned away from him.

Numbers 20:21 nkjv

Thus Edom refused to give Israel passage through his territory; so Israel turned away from him.

Numbers 20:21 niv

Since Edom refused to let them go through their territory, Israel turned away from them.

Numbers 20:21 esv

Thus Edom refused to give Israel passage through his territory, so Israel turned away from him.

Numbers 20:21 nlt

Because Edom refused to allow Israel to pass through their country, Israel was forced to turn around.

Numbers 20 verses

Numbers 20 21 Meaning

Numbers 20:21 states that Edom actively refused Israel's request for peaceful passage through their territory. Consequently, Israel did not force the issue but turned away from them, altering their planned route through the wilderness. This verse highlights a pivotal moment where Israel, seeking a direct path to the Promised Land, faced unexpected opposition from a related nation, forcing a significant detour.

Numbers 20 21 Context

Numbers chapter 20 is a critical part of Israel's journey in the wilderness during their final year before entering the Promised Land. It opens with the death of Miriam, then highlights the renewed grumbling of the Israelites due to lack of water at Kadesh. This leads to Moses' critical sin at the Waters of Meribah (v. 2-13), where he strikes the rock instead of speaking to it, resulting in God's judgment that he will not enter Canaan. Following this, Moses sends a peaceful diplomatic request to the King of Edom (v. 14-17) for safe passage through the King's Highway, promising a direct, unmolested journey. Edom's hostile and militaristic refusal (v. 18-20) culminates in this verse (v. 21), forcing Israel to change their strategic course. The "King's Highway" was a vital ancient trade route, and Edom's control of it reflected their sovereign authority and perceived threat from a large approaching group like Israel.

Numbers 20 21 Word analysis

• Thus: This serves as a concluding transition, indicating a consequence of the prior interaction described in Numbers 20:18-20. It points to Edom's firm response to Israel's request.
• Edom: This refers to the nation and descendants of Esau, Jacob's twin brother. Their identity as "brother" to Israel makes their refusal particularly significant and poignant. Despite the kinship appeal, geopolitical interests and ancient rivalries prevailed.
• refused: The Hebrew word here is וַיְמָאֵן (vayima'en), from the root מָאַן (ma'an), which means "to refuse," "decline," or "be unwilling." The form used (Hiphil imperfect) emphasizes an active, deliberate, and definitive rejection. It wasn't a mere inability but an intentional decision not to permit passage, backed by a military threat (Num 20:20).
• to give Israel passage: This refers to the direct, peaceful travel route through Edomite territory, specifically "the King's Highway," which would have saved Israel a considerable, arduous detour. It highlights the strategic nature of their request.
• through their territory: The phrase בִּגְבֻלֹם (bigvulom) refers to Edom's defined border or land. This emphasizes Edom's assertion of their sovereign right over their domain, fearing Israel as a large, migrating force, despite Moses' assurances of peaceful intent.
• so Israel turned away: The Hebrew word וַיֵּט (vayyeṭ), from the root נָטָה (natah), means "to incline," "stretch out," or "turn aside." Here, it signifies that Israel actively changed their direction and retreated from Edomite confrontation. This demonstrates a strategic pivot and obedience to God's earlier instructions (Deut 2:4-5) not to engage militarily with Edom over land.
• from them: Referring to the Edomites and their land, signifying Israel's disengagement from any potential conflict and their physical removal from Edomite proximity.

Words-group by words-group analysis:

• "Edom refused to give Israel passage": This phrase captures the core conflict. Edom's active refusal is critical. It underscores that this was a deliberate act of hostility from a "brother" nation, blocking the direct, desired path. This act of sovereignty by Edom results in a significant obstruction for God's chosen people.
• "so Israel turned away from them": This part highlights Israel's response. Instead of forcing passage, despite their superior numbers, Israel demonstrated submission and obedience (likely to God's long-standing directive regarding Esau's territory, Deut 2:4-5). This pivotal turn means a longer, more arduous journey but avoids direct military conflict with Edom at this juncture, illustrating trust in God's guiding hand even when plans are disrupted.

Numbers 20 21 Bonus section

The seemingly simple act of turning away had immense practical consequences. The detour around Edom was not merely a few extra miles but a significant change to a longer, harsher, and more discouraging route that directly led to further Israelite complaints (Num 21:4-5), and subsequently, God sending fiery serpents as judgment. This incident sets the stage for future, long-standing animosity between Israel and Edom (later identified as Edom in prophecy against Judah). Though God had instructed respect for Edom's territory, Edom's unfraternal act initiated a pattern of conflict that would define much of their later biblical history, impacting various kingships and prophetic judgments against Edom for their animosity towards Jacob/Israel. This passage emphasizes that divine leading might include challenging paths or obstacles presented by others' wills, and faithful perseverance through such difficulties is crucial.

Numbers 20 21 Commentary

Numbers 20:21 is a concise yet profound summary of a significant diplomatic failure and a consequential change in Israel's wilderness journey. Edom's outright refusal, born out of mistrust and territorial defensiveness rather than hospitality for their kin, forces Israel to abandon their preferred direct route. The verb "refused" (vayima'en) powerfully conveys the decisive and firm nature of Edom's stance, highlighting an intentional act of obstruction. Israel's "turning away" (vayyeṭ) is equally significant. It signals their decision to not force passage through military means, aligning with God's long-held divine decree (Deut 2:4-5) that the Edomites' land was rightfully theirs by divine grant to Esau.

This incident reveals several layers of theological and practical insight: It demonstrates that God's people, even under divine leading, will encounter human obstacles, often from unexpected sources or "kinsmen." It reaffirms God's ultimate sovereignty over paths and plans; even when human resistance alters the intended course, God's greater purpose is not thwarted but rerouted. The longer, harder way around Edom subsequently leads to further tests of Israel's faith, as seen in their grumbling due to the "impatient" journey in the next chapter (Num 21:4). Ultimately, it teaches obedience and patience, acknowledging that the best path is not always the easiest, but the one God directs, even through detour and delay.

• Example for practical usage: When a desired door is closed by someone's clear refusal, discern if it's an opportunity for a different, divinely ordained path rather than a reason to force an issue or grumble excessively. Trust that God's reroutes have purpose.