Matthew 14 7

Matthew 14:7 kjv

Whereupon he promised with an oath to give her whatsoever she would ask.

Matthew 14:7 nkjv

Therefore he promised with an oath to give her whatever she might ask.

Matthew 14:7 niv

that he promised with an oath to give her whatever she asked.

Matthew 14:7 esv

so that he promised with an oath to give her whatever she might ask.

Matthew 14:7 nlt

so he promised with a vow to give her anything she wanted.

Matthew 14 verses

Matthew 14 7 Meaning

Matthew 14:7 describes Herod Antipas's binding declaration to his stepdaughter, Salome, after she pleased him with her dancing during his birthday celebration. Overcome with delight and aiming to show his generosity publicly, he swore an oath that he would grant her anything she desired, no matter the extent. This promise set the stage for the tragic request of John the Baptist's head.

Matthew 14 7 Context

Matthew 14:7 is nestled within the tragic narrative of John the Baptist's beheading. Prior to this verse, Herod Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, had imprisoned John due to John's condemnation of Herod's illicit marriage to Herodias, his brother Philip's wife. Herodias held a deep grudge against John and sought to have him killed, but Herod initially protected John because he feared him, knowing he was a righteous and holy man, and he often listened to him (Mk 6:20). On Herod's birthday, he hosted a lavish banquet. During the celebration, Salome, the daughter of Herodias, danced and greatly pleased Herod and his dinner guests. The king's extravagant promise in verse 7 directly results from this pleased state and his desire to publicly demonstrate his kingly authority and generosity, setting the stage for Herodias's malicious scheme to be carried out through her daughter's demand.

Matthew 14 7 Word analysis

• Whereupon (Greek: ὅθεν, hothen):
  • Meaning: From where, for which cause, hence, therefore.
  • Significance: Connects Herod's oath directly as a consequence of Salome's pleasing dance. It signifies the immediate motivation for his utterance.
• he promised (Greek: ὡμολόγησεν, homologēsen - Aorist indicative active of homologeo):
  • Meaning: To agree with, confess, acknowledge, profess, promise.
  • Significance: This is not just a casual suggestion but a solemn declaration or acknowledgment of intent. It implies a public agreement or affirmation.
• with an oath (Greek: μεθ' ὅρκου, meth horkou):
  • Meaning: "Meth" (prep. with), "horkou" (genitive of horkos, oath). An oath is a formal, binding declaration often made by appealing to a higher power (God) to confirm its truth or ensure its fulfillment.
  • Significance: In ancient cultures, particularly among the Jews, an oath was considered profoundly sacred and unbreakable. Herod invoked this serious commitment, sealing his promise with divine or solemn confirmation, making it seemingly impossible to retract without immense public dishonor or spiritual offense in their understanding.
• to give her (Greek: δοῦναι αὐτῇ, dounai autē):
  • Meaning: To give to her (dative case).
  • Significance: Identifies the recipient and the act of bestowal.
• whatsoever (Greek: ὃ ἐὰν, ho ean):
  • Meaning: Whatever, whichever, anything. A phrase conveying unlimited scope.
  • Significance: Emphasizes the unbounded nature of his promise; there were no conditions or limitations initially stated, giving the recipient full discretionary power over the request.
• she would ask (Greek: αἰτήσηται, aitēsētai - Aorist subjunctive middle of aiteo):
  • Meaning: She may ask, she should ask, she might request.
  • Significance: Indicates the act of requesting, future and contingent upon her desire. The subjunctive mood highlights the potentiality and generality of her request, reinforcing the "whatever" aspect.

Words-Group by Words-Group Analysis:

• Whereupon he promised: Establishes the cause-and-effect, and the king's active, intentional declaration, rooted in the pleasure he derived. This links the action to an immediate emotional response rather than considered judgment.
• with an oath to give her: This phrase underscores the gravity and perceived irrevocability of the commitment. The oath transforms a king's mere word into a binding, public, and culturally sacred obligation. It places Herod in a moral dilemma: fulfilling a wicked request versus breaking a solemn oath.
• whatsoever she would ask: Reveals the rashness and extreme nature of the promise. Herod committed to an unknown future request without any boundaries or consideration of potential consequences, demonstrating his impulsivity and lack of prudence under the influence of pleasure and public expectation.

Matthew 14 7 Bonus section

• Kingly responsibility vs. private indulgence: The verse demonstrates a leader's failure to uphold his public trust. Herod's primary duty was justice, yet he compromised it for personal gratification and public approval. His commitment to an "oath" for a trivial matter far exceeded his commitment to righteousness and truth, for which John had spoken.
• Echoes of Ancient Near East practices: Kings making lavish promises in celebration were not uncommon in the ancient world (cf. Esther 5:3, "half the kingdom"). However, the tragic outcome in Matthew emphasizes the unique danger when such unchecked authority is coupled with moral depravity and manipulative forces.
• Foreshadowing of sacrifice: John's martyrdom, sealed by Herod's rash oath, subtly foreshadows Christ's ultimate sacrifice, also influenced by a powerful figure (Pilate) succumbing to popular pressure rather than upholding justice. Both innocent deaths occur at the hands of those in power who prioritized expediency or popular favor over divine truth.

Matthew 14 7 Commentary

Matthew 14:7 encapsulates a moment of impulsive generosity turned into a snare. Herod Antipas, a tetrarch whose reign was characterized by political intrigue and moral compromise, succumbs to public showmanship and momentary pleasure. His "oath" (μεθ' ὅρκου) transforms a lavish promise into a divinely-witnessed, binding declaration in the eyes of his culture, thereby trapping him. This highlights the dangers of oaths made without proper consideration (Prov 20:25, Eccl 5:4-5) and the folly of fearing man more than God (Prov 29:25). Herod, desiring to maintain his reputation and not lose face before his guests, found himself constrained by his own rash vow to fulfill a murderous request. This act stands in stark contrast to the integrity of John the Baptist and reveals the corrupting power of unchecked worldly desire, external pressure, and the manipulative schemes of those like Herodias. The verse thus sets up the execution of God's prophet not by direct malevolence on Herod's part but through his weakness and entrapment by a foolish, ungodly promise.