Luke 22 70

Luke 22:70 kjv

Then said they all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he said unto them, Ye say that I am.

Luke 22:70 nkjv

Then they all said, "Are You then the Son of God?" So He said to them, "You rightly say that I am."

Luke 22:70 niv

They all asked, "Are you then the Son of God?" He replied, "You say that I am."

Luke 22:70 esv

So they all said, "Are you the Son of God, then?" And he said to them, "You say that I am."

Luke 22:70 nlt

They all shouted, "So, are you claiming to be the Son of God?" And he replied, "You say that I am."

Luke 22 verses

Luke 22 70 Meaning

Luke 22:70 describes a pivotal moment during Jesus's trial before the Jewish Sanhedrin. Following Jesus's declaration of His future glory as the Son of Man seated at the right hand of God, the council collectively demands clarification regarding His identity: "Are you then the Son of God?" Jesus's response, "You say that I am," serves as a definitive affirmation of His divine sonship, while strategically placing the onus of the direct declaration upon His interrogators, affirming their conclusion as truth. This brief exchange encapsulates the core of their accusation and His true identity.

Luke 22 70 Context

Luke 22:70 is found within the narrative of Jesus's trial before the Sanhedrin (Luke 22:66-71). Following His arrest, Jesus is brought before the supreme Jewish legal and religious body. The council seeks to find grounds for a death sentence. Their initial interrogations focus on His claims of Messiahship (v. 67). Jesus declares that if He tells them, they will not believe Him (v. 67) and if He asks them, they will not answer (v. 68). The critical turning point comes in verse 69, where Jesus pronounces, "But from now on the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the power of God." This declaration is the direct catalyst for the Sanhedrin's question in verse 70.The historical context reveals that the Jewish leaders struggled to reconcile Jesus's messianic claims with their earthly expectations of a kingly Messiah. Furthermore, linking the "Son of Man" with "seated at the right hand of the power of God" implied divine authority and equality with God, a concept bordering on blasphemy to them unless attributed to God alone. This challenge to their understanding of God's uniqueness forms the underlying polemic against Jesus's claim. They recognized the implication of His claim: an ontological Sonship rather than just a metaphorical or adopted one.

Luke 22 70 Word analysis

• Then said they all: The collective response ("all," Gk: pantes) signifies the consensus of the entire Sanhedrin, underscoring the weight and unanimity of their inquiry. This shows the trial was a public inquiry before the entire council.
• Are you then: The Greek sy oun ei (σὺ οὖν εἶ), using the emphatic personal pronoun sy ("you"), puts a direct and pointed challenge to Jesus. The interrogative "Are you then" expresses a logical conclusion or reaction to Jesus's previous statement (v. 69), recognizing the gravity of His claim about the Son of Man's future enthronement.
• the Son of God?: The Greek ho Huios tou Theou (ὁ Υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ) is highly significant. In Jewish thought, "Son of God" could refer to Israel (Hos 11:1), the king (2 Sam 7:14), or righteous individuals. However, when paired with the Son of Man from Daniel 7:13-14 who is given universal, everlasting dominion and implicitly linked with "the power of God" (God's throne), it pushes towards a unique, divine Sonship and equality with God, which for the Sanhedrin, would be blasphemy if asserted by a mere man. This question highlights their accurate, albeit condemning, understanding of Jesus's implication.
• And he said to them: Jesus directly addresses the whole council, acknowledging their collective inquiry.
• You say that I am: The Greek Hymeis legete hoti ego eimi (Ὑμεῖς λέγετε ὅτι ἐγώ εἰμι) is a critically important Jewish idiom for a strong affirmation. While not a simple "Yes," it implies "Yes, as you correctly state" or "You are right in saying so." It acknowledges that their inference from His preceding statement (about the Son of Man) is correct. It places the definitive assertion of the title upon their own lips, making it clear they drew the conclusion themselves from His words, rather than Jesus explicitly uttering the "blasphemous" direct claim in their eyes, yet still fully confirming His divine identity. The ego eimi ("I am") itself carries a divine resonance (Exod 3:14, John 8:58), implicitly reaffirming His deity.

Words-group analysis:

• Then said they all, 'Are you then the Son of God?': This group of words indicates the unified, emphatic questioning by the Jewish religious elite, seeking direct confirmation of Jesus's perceived blasphemous claim of divine status derived from His mention of the Son of Man being seated at God's right hand. Their question itself betrays an understanding, however begrudging, of the profundity of Jesus's identity claims.
• 'You say that I am.': This concise yet powerful statement is Jesus's affirmative, strategic response. It confirms their deduction and His divine nature, avoids a simple "yes" that could be twisted, and echoes the divine "I AM" of Exodus, asserting His eternal being while allowing His interrogators to verbalize the truth that indicts them for rejecting it.

Luke 22 70 Bonus section

The Sanhedrin’s choice of “Son of God” rather than “Christ” or “Messiah” (as in Matthew 26:63 and Mark 14:61) is significant. It implies their focus had shifted beyond a mere earthly king to the unprecedented claim of a human making himself equal with God, recognizing the depth of Jesus’s prior statement. This also positions their charge primarily as blasphemy, a religious crime punishable by death, rather than merely political insurrection. The interchange confirms that Jesus affirmed His unique relationship with the Father, identifying Himself fully with the powerful prophetic "Son of Man" and the "Son of God" with inherent divine attributes. The unanimous "they all" underscores the collective rejection of His divine identity by the religious authority of the time.

Luke 22 70 Commentary

Luke 22:70 reveals the crucial exchange that forms the basis of Jesus's condemnation by the Sanhedrin. When Jesus asserts His future glory as the enthroned Son of Man, the council immediately interprets this through the lens of divine sonship. Their question, "Are you then the Son of God?" shows they understood His previous statement as a claim to deity, correctly linking the Old Testament "Son of Man" (Daniel 7:13-14) with the ultimate authority and status next to God Himself. Jesus's answer, "You say that I am," is not an evasion but an emphatic affirmation rooted in common Jewish linguistic practice. He affirms that their conclusion, derived from His own divine implications, is correct. This response, coupled with His earlier statement in Luke 22:69, constituted what the Sanhedrin considered blasphemy (Leviticus 24:16; Matthew 26:65-66), paving the way for their demand for His death. It powerfully demonstrates Jesus's self-understanding as truly divine, a truth which the council, blinded by their rigid interpretations, refused to accept, ultimately sealing their condemnation and His mission.