Luke 22 35

Luke 22:35 kjv

And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing.

Luke 22:35 nkjv

And He said to them, "When I sent you without money bag, knapsack, and sandals, did you lack anything?" So they said, "Nothing."

Luke 22:35 niv

Then Jesus asked them, "When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?" "Nothing," they answered.

Luke 22:35 esv

And he said to them, "When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?" They said, "Nothing."

Luke 22:35 nlt

Then Jesus asked them, "When I sent you out to preach the Good News and you did not have money, a traveler's bag, or an extra pair of sandals, did you need anything?" "No," they replied.

Luke 22 verses

Luke 22 35 Meaning

In Luke 22:35, Jesus reminds His disciples of a previous mission where He sent them out without conventional travel provisions such as a moneybag, a knapsack, or sandals. He then asks if they lacked anything during that time, to which they affirmed, "Nothing." This verse serves as a crucial point of reflection on God's faithful provision, establishing a stark contrast and preparatory background for the new and challenging phase of ministry they are about to enter after His departure.

Luke 22 35 Context

Luke 22:35 takes place during the Last Supper, on the night before Jesus' crucifixion. This moment is deeply reflective and transitional. Jesus is providing final, intimate teachings and preparing His disciples for His imminent departure, the challenges of His crucifixion, and their subsequent independent mission. The conversation pivots from sharing the Passover meal and instituting the New Covenant to practical instructions and warnings for the future. By referencing their successful previous mission (Luke 9 and 10), where they lacked nothing despite having no provisions, Jesus affirms God's past faithfulness. This affirmation then sets the stage for a dramatic shift in instructions (Luke 22:36), indicating that the future ministry context will be different—less hospitably received and requiring a greater degree of self-sufficiency, albeit still under divine sovereignty.

Luke 22 35 Word analysis

• And he said to them, "When I sent you out...": This introduction underscores Jesus' authority as the initiator of their mission. The Greek word for "sent out" is apostellō (ἀποστέλλω), meaning "to send off, send forth, commission." It emphasizes their identity as commissioned messengers or apostles, sent with a specific purpose and divine authority.
• without moneybag: The Greek term is balantion (βαλάντιον). This was a small purse or pouch for carrying money, typically tied to the belt. To go without it signified a complete reliance on God's provision through the hospitality of those they ministered to, rather than on their own financial resources. It emphasized vulnerability and trust.
• or knapsack: The Greek word is pēra (πήρα). This referred to a leather bag or beggar's sack, often carried by travelers, especially philosophers or itinerants, for carrying food and provisions for the journey. For the disciples to travel without it indicated that their sustenance would come directly from the Lord through others' hospitality, not through their own planning or storing.
• or sandals: The Greek word is hypodēma (ὑπόδημα). This refers to footwear. While Jesus initially forbade them, other accounts (Mk 6:9) allow "sandals." Luke's consistent message on this instruction, here recalling the absence of sandals, underlines a message of detachment from worldly comforts and swift, unencumbered travel in urgency for the Kingdom, trusting God for protection on the road.
• did you lack anything?: The verb "lack" is from the Greek hystereō (ὑστερέω), meaning "to be behind, to fail, to fall short, to be in want or need of something." It implies experiencing deprivation or insufficiency. Jesus' rhetorical question challenges them to confirm God's past faithfulness in providing for all their needs.
• They said, "Nothing.": The disciples' unanimous and emphatic response, Oudenos (οὐδενός), literally "of nothing," powerfully affirms God's meticulous care and faithfulness during their mission. This simple declaration highlights the complete absence of any felt need or hardship, serving as proof of divine sustenance even when human provisions were absent.

Words-group by words-group analysis:

• "When I sent you out without moneybag or knapsack or sandals": This phrase specifically refers to the first missions described in Lk 9:3 and 10:4, setting a clear historical and theological precedent. The enumeration of common travel items they were told not to carry emphasizes a radical form of reliance on divine provision and local hospitality. This instruction was practical yet deeply spiritual, teaching humility and faith. It distinguished Jesus' messengers from typical traveling teachers or merchants who relied on their own means.
• "did you lack anything?": This rhetorical question functions as a test of their memory and understanding of God's past providence. It forces the disciples to acknowledge directly that their physical needs were met despite their initial, unconventional, and seemingly inadequate preparation. This acknowledgement then underscores the surprising abundance found in absolute reliance on God.
• "They said, 'Nothing.'": This direct and unambiguous response from the disciples confirms the truth of Jesus' underlying premise: God is entirely sufficient. Their personal experience testified to the unfailing provision of the Father through Jesus, providing a foundational truth upon which new instructions could be built. This 'nothing' means not a single thing was missed or was desired by them or God could not provide. This means God will surely provide.

Luke 22 35 Bonus section

The seemingly paradoxical instructions in Luke 22:35-36 highlight a crucial theological principle: while God's provision is constant, the method and context of that provision can change. The first mission (Lk 9-10) was characterized by openness to the Gospel, necessitating total reliance on the Lord to demonstrate His power and the urgent nature of the message. The post-resurrection mission would involve greater resistance, persecution, and a more defined self-identity for the Church, requiring wisdom in navigating practical realities alongside spiritual dependence. This shift doesn't mean a lapse in faith or abandonment of dependence on God, but rather a maturity in ministry that integrates both spiritual trust and responsible stewardship. It also anticipates the nature of evangelism after Christ's ascension: while the Holy Spirit empowers, the messengers themselves must be ready for practical challenges, discerning when divine intervention will manifest directly and when it will manifest through wise human foresight and provision. The peace they had in the previous mission will turn to necessary self-provision or means because the world has changed and the way of receiving the Kingdom of God.

Luke 22 35 Commentary

Luke 22:35 serves as a pivotal point in Jesus' final teachings, demonstrating God's faithful provision in the past as a prelude to a significant change in the disciples' ministry. The earlier directive to travel unencumbered fostered radical trust in God and dependence on local hospitality. The disciples' clear affirmation, "Nothing," underscores the consistent truth that when God sends, He provides, and genuine needs are met regardless of human-prepared resources. This verse prepares the ground for Jesus' next, seemingly contradictory instruction to now carry moneybag, knapsack, and even swords (Lk 22:36). The message isn't a retraction of divine provision but a revelation of a shifting landscape: the initial, relatively peaceful "season of favor" (Lk 4:19) where the disciples were well-received, is ending. The future will involve opposition, self-defense (spiritually and perhaps physically), and less readily available hospitality. Even in this new reality, God's provision remains; the means of that provision, however, may involve human preparation and diligence in a hostile world. The core message remains one of trust, but the practical implications change.