Judges 20:3 kjv
(Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel were gone up to Mizpeh.) Then said the children of Israel, Tell us, how was this wickedness?
Judges 20:3 nkjv
(Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpah.) Then the children of Israel said, "Tell us, how did this wicked deed happen?"
Judges 20:3 niv
(The Benjamites heard that the Israelites had gone up to Mizpah.) Then the Israelites said, "Tell us how this awful thing happened."
Judges 20:3 esv
(Now the people of Benjamin heard that the people of Israel had gone up to Mizpah.) And the people of Israel said, "Tell us, how did this evil happen?"
Judges 20:3 nlt
(Word soon reached the land of Benjamin that the other tribes had gone up to Mizpah.) The Israelites then asked how this terrible crime had happened.
Judges 20 3 Cross References
| Verse | Text | Reference ||------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|| Judg 19:22-26 | The wicked deed in Gibeah that sparked the conflict. | Root cause of the war. || Judg 19:30 | The Israelite outrage over the Levite's concubine. | Israel's justification for war. || Judg 20:1-2 | All Israel gathers at Mizpah to seek counsel from God. | Context of the assembly. || Gen 31:49 | Mizpah, meaning "watchtower," also where Jacob and Laban made a covenant. | Significance of Mizpah as covenant place. || 1 Sam 7:5-11 | Israel gathers at Mizpah to repent and fight the Philistines. | Mizpah as a place of national assembly. || 1 Sam 10:17 | Samuel convenes Israel at Mizpah to appoint a king. | Mizpah as a gathering for leadership. || Judg 10:17 | Israel gathering to fight the Ammonites at Mizpah. | Mizpah for national defense. || Judg 17:6 | "In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes." | Explains the societal breakdown. || Judg 18:1 | Reiterates the "no king" theme. | Further highlights lack of authority. || Judg 19:1 | Emphasizes the chaotic state. | Reinforces the absence of leadership. || Judg 21:25 | Final verdict on the Judges era, moral decline. | Culmination of the chaos. || Deut 13:12-18| Instructions on dealing with evil in a city/tribe. | Israel's attempt to apply God's law. || Lev 19:17-18 | Commands to confront sin and love neighbor. | Underlying ethical principle. || Prov 29:2 | When the righteous rule, the people rejoice; but when the wicked rule, the people groan. | Contrast with leadership void. || Ps 78:60-61 | God abandoning His dwelling because of Israel's sin. | Consequence of unfaithfulness. || Ps 106:34-40 | Israel's apostasy and the ensuing consequences. | Patterns of disobedience. || Isa 1:21-23 | Describes Jerusalem as a harlot and full of injustice. | Echoes Israel's moral decay. || Jer 4:5-6 | A call for battle and warning of destruction. | Prophetic warnings about national judgment. || Rom 1:28-32 | Describes ungodliness leading to depraved minds and wicked acts. | Explains the depths of sin in Judges. || Gal 5:15 | Warning against devouring one another. | Spiritual warning against internal strife. || 1 Cor 6:7-8 | Christians litigating against each other. | The destructive nature of internal conflict. || Eph 4:26-27 | Deal with anger; do not give the devil a foothold. | Principles for conflict resolution. |
Judges 20 verses
Judges 20 3 Meaning
Judges 20:3 relays the critical intelligence received by the tribe of Benjamin: the other Israelite tribes had converged at Mizpah. This verse marks the shift from the assembly of Israel to the awareness of the targeted tribe, signaling the impending military confrontation and civil war, rooted in Benjamin's grave sin (the Gibeah outrage) and their refusal to deliver the offenders.
Judges 20 3 Context
Judges chapter 20 describes the tragic civil war between the tribe of Benjamin and the united tribes of Israel. The conflict erupts as a consequence of the horrifying atrocity committed by men of Gibeah (a Benjaminite city) against a Levite's concubine (Judges 19). Outraged, the other eleven tribes of Israel assembled at Mizpah (v. 1), determined to confront Benjamin regarding this heinous crime. Verse 3 is a pivotal moment: it confirms Benjamin's awareness of this national mobilization. This knowledge from their perspective prepares them for the impending conflict, highlighting that Benjamin's defiance was not from ignorance but a conscious decision to defend their kin, even in great wickedness.
Judges 20 3 Word analysis
Now: Signals a new development or transition in the narrative, highlighting the immediate consequence of the prior events.
the children of Benjamin: Refers to the tribal group descended from Benjamin, Jacob's youngest son. It emphasizes their collective identity and responsibility for actions within their tribal territory. Their solidarity, though misplaced here, reveals strong internal tribal loyalty.
- Hebrew:
Benei Binyamin
(בְנֵֽי־ בִנְיָמִן) - 'sons of Benjamin'.
- Hebrew:
heard: Indicates perception and acquisition of information. It implies the news spread, perhaps by scouts or messengers, underscoring Benjamin's awareness of the unfolding national crisis. It is not "discovered" but "heard," suggesting an active transmission or recognition of the assembly.
- Hebrew:
Shama
(שָׁמַע) - to hear, perceive, understand, obey. In this context, it implies cognitive reception, not necessarily compliance.
- Hebrew:
that the children of Israel: Refers to the rest of the Israelite tribes, excluding Benjamin. This phrase emphasizes the collective opposition and judgment being mounted against one of their own, signaling a nationwide unity against sin within the covenant community.
- Hebrew:
Benei Yisrael
(בְנֵֽי־ יִשְׂרָאֵל) - 'sons of Israel'.
- Hebrew:
had gone up: Denotes movement towards a higher place, often implying a journey for a significant purpose, such as assembly, worship, or warfare. It suggests a deliberate, organized movement to a strategic or sacred location.
- Hebrew:
ʿalot
(עֲלוֹת) fromalah
(עָלָה) - to go up, ascend. Often used for pilgrimages or going up to battle.
- Hebrew:
to Mizpah: A significant locale in the Israelite territory, particularly in Benjamin's tribal land or nearby. It served as a watchtower or elevated point, historically recognized as a gathering place for tribal assemblies, covenants, and national decisions (e.g., Gen 31; Judg 10-11; 1 Sam 7). Its strategic and historical importance for such an assembly emphasizes the gravity of the situation.
- Hebrew:
Mitzpah
(מִצְפָּ֔תָה) - 'watchtower' or 'lookout place'.
- Hebrew:
"the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpah": This full phrase indicates the critical exchange of information preceding the civil war. Benjamin's awareness transformed the assembly from an internal deliberation of Israel into an immediate threat for the Benjaminites, prompting their defensive preparations rather than repentance. It underscores the lack of communication and perhaps shared understanding between the tribes, beyond the formal call for justice. This communication failure contributes to the escalating tragedy.
Judges 20 3 Bonus section
The historical location of Mizpah often served as a critical nexus for tribal identity and inter-tribal relations. Its mention here signifies not merely a geographical meeting point but a place endowed with historical memory of covenant and communal decision-making. The assembly here underscores the national indignation at the horrific crime of Gibeah, illustrating that even in moral decline, Israel's core identity as God's covenant people could be stirred to collective action, albeit with flawed execution. The fact that Benjamin heard about this mobilization, rather than being part of it, highlights their isolation or active distancing from the consensus of the other tribes, setting the stage for their catastrophic and near-annihilating resistance against the rest of Israel.
Judges 20 3 Commentary
Judges 20:3 acts as a narrative hinge, transforming Israel's indignant gathering into Benjamin's informed stand. The verse concisely depicts the crucial moment Benjamin becomes aware of the collective wrath against them. This awareness, however, does not lead to a delivery of the offenders but to defiant self-defense. It tragically illustrates the pervasive spiritual decay of the Judges era: the absence of a godly king led to a complete breakdown of justice and moral authority, with even a just cause for intervention spiraling into fratricidal war. This lack of proper leadership and the failure to distinguish righteousness from misplaced loyalty ultimately plunged Israel into one of its darkest periods.