Judges 19 4

Judges 19:4 kjv

And his father in law, the damsel's father, retained him; and he abode with him three days: so they did eat and drink, and lodged there.

Judges 19:4 nkjv

Now his father-in-law, the young woman's father, detained him; and he stayed with him three days. So they ate and drank and lodged there.

Judges 19:4 niv

His father-in-law, the woman's father, prevailed on him to stay; so he remained with him three days, eating and drinking, and sleeping there.

Judges 19:4 esv

And his father-in-law, the girl's father, made him stay, and he remained with him three days. So they ate and drank and spent the night there.

Judges 19:4 nlt

Her father urged him to stay awhile, so he stayed three days, eating, drinking, and sleeping there.

Judges 19 verses

Judges 19 4 Meaning

Judges 19:4 describes the immediate reception of the Levite and his concubine at the home of the young woman’s father in Bethlehem. The verse emphasizes the father-in-law's strong act of keeping or detaining his son-in-law, leading to a three-day period of shared hospitality, including eating, drinking, and lodging. This extended stay, driven by the father-in-law's insistence, establishes a bond of fellowship and sets the scene for the subsequent prolonged delay that has critical implications for the unfolding narrative.

Judges 19 4 Context

Judges chapter 19 initiates a disturbing narrative within the book, which broadly portrays a period in Israel marked by moral decay and lawlessness where "every man did what was right in his own eyes" (Jdg 17:6, 21:25). The verse sits at the beginning of the Levite's fateful journey to reclaim his concubine. After retrieving her from her father’s house in Bethlehem-Judah, the Levite and his entourage prepare to return home. Judges 19:4 immediately highlights the initial welcome and hospitality extended by the concubine's father. This hospitality, however, turns into a protracted delay at the father-in-law's insistence, foreshadowing the lack of timely discernment and sound judgment that will tragically unfold later in the chapter as the journey is ultimately undertaken at an ill-advised time, leading to horrific consequences. The initial stay appears benevolent but leads to further problematic lingering.

Judges 19 4 Word analysis

• And his father-in-law (וַיַּחֲתֵ֤ן — wayyachaten, "and related by marriage/made a father-in-law to himself"): The text highlights the specific familial bond. The term 'father-in-law' (ḥōṯēn) implies an honored relationship and a duty of care, but also a potential for exerting influence or authority. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, a father-in-law could hold significant sway, especially concerning his daughter and son-in-law.
• the young woman's father: This clarifies the specific relationship and underscores his paternal role. It reinforces his desire to protect and retain his daughter and her new husband, setting the stage for his persistence.
• kept him; (וַיַּחֲזֶק בּוֹ — wayyachazeq bo, literally "and he strengthened/held firm onto him" or "insisted strongly with him"): This is a strong verb. It signifies active detention, strong persuasion, or holding onto someone firmly. It’s not a passive welcome but an intentional, forceful act of retention, perhaps out of affection, but also exerting control. This "keeping" initiates the delay.
• and he stayed with him (וַיֵּ֧שֶׁב עִמּ֛וֹ — wayyeshev ‘immô, "and he sat/dwelled with him"): This implies residence and settled living for a period, rather than a mere stopover. It points to a period of comfort and ease.
• three days, (שְׁלֹ֥שֶׁת יָמִ֖ים — sheloshath yamim): The number three often carries significance in biblical narratives, sometimes denoting completeness, intensity, or a significant period. Here, it marks a definite period of hospitality, which sets a precedent for the subsequent, much longer, and ultimately detrimental extensions of the visit in the verses that follow (vv. 5, 8). This initial hospitality, however well-intended, contributes to the Levite's later perilous choices.
• so they ate and drank, and lodged there: This describes the typical activities of a hospitable stay, denoting fellowship and comfort. The shared meal was a significant sign of covenant, peace, and deepened relationship in the ancient world. The emphasis on "lodging there" means they were comfortably settled. This portrayal contrasts sharply with the horror that awaits them when they eventually depart under less favorable conditions.

Judges 19 4 Bonus section

The passage implicitly sets up a conflict between personal comfort/familial affection and the demands of travel and timely return. While hospitality was a sacred duty, especially among relatives in ancient Israel, the excess shown by the father-in-law, in progressively delaying his son-in-law's departure (as seen in subsequent verses), highlights how a good tradition can be misapplied or overextended. The narrative uses this excessive hospitality as a literary device to underscore the Levite's passive nature and poor judgment, indirectly leading to the late-day journey that ends in Gibeah. This prolonged stay demonstrates a subtle negligence on the part of the Levite to insist on leaving, contributing to his compromised situation later.

Judges 19 4 Commentary

Judges 19:4 marks the beginning of a crucial period of delay and comfort in a narrative that quickly descends into chaos. The father-in-law’s forceful insistence (vayyachazeq) to keep the Levite and his concubine for "three days" highlights an abundance of traditional hospitality, which in itself is positive. However, this benevolence sets a dangerous precedent. The seemingly innocent act of prolonging a guest's stay, marked by eating and drinking, ultimately feeds into the pattern of lingering and bad decision-making that defines the Levite's journey. This passage underscores how good intentions, when coupled with a lack of foresight or spiritual discernment regarding the timing of duties, can lead to catastrophic outcomes, especially in a context where societal morality has already deteriorated, as was the case in the time of the Judges. It points to a broader theme of individuals prioritizing comfort and convenience over their responsibilities, or failing to act decisively.