John 1 22

John 1:22 kjv

Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?

John 1:22 nkjv

Then they said to him, "Who are you, that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?"

John 1:22 niv

Finally they said, "Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?"

John 1:22 esv

So they said to him, "Who are you? We need to give an answer to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?"

John 1:22 nlt

"Then who are you? We need an answer for those who sent us. What do you have to say about yourself?"

John 1 22 Cross References

VerseTextReference
Jn 1:19This is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites...Immediate context of the delegation
Jn 1:20He confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.John's initial denial
Jn 1:21And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not...John's further denials (Elijah, Prophet)
Jn 1:23He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness...John's positive self-identification
Isa 40:3The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord...Prophecy John fulfills (cited in Jn 1:23)
Mal 3:1Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me...Prophecy of John's role
Matt 3:3For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying...Matthew identifying John with Isaiah 40:3
Lk 20:1-2...the chief priests and the scribes with the elders came upon him...Religious leaders questioning Jesus' authority
Acts 4:7And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, By what power...?Apostles questioned by religious leaders
Jer 20:10...the chief of my friends watch for my halting, saying, Peradventure...Jeremiah questioned/opposed
Deu 18:15The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee...Prophecy of 'the Prophet'
Mk 11:27-28...as he was walking in the temple, there come to him the chief priests...Religious leaders demanding Jesus' authority
Jn 5:31If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.Jesus on self-witness
Acts 1:8But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you:Importance of witnessing for Christ
1 Pet 3:15...and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you...Readiness to give an account of faith
Rom 10:9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe...Confession/declaration of identity
Matt 21:23...the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him...Authorities questioning Jesus' authority
Lk 7:19-20And John calling unto him two of his disciples sent them to Jesus, saying...John sending a delegation to seek clarity
Gal 4:4But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son...God sending His Messenger/Son
Titus 1:1Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith...Emphasizes need for clear identification
Ps 2:7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son...Divine declaration of identity (Messiah)
Isa 61:1The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me...Prophecy of the Anointed One
Zech 4:6Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts.Understanding divine workings vs. human might
Mt 14:1-2...Herod the tetrarch heard of the fame of Jesus, And said unto his servants...Political authorities trying to identify Jesus
Jn 8:25Then said they unto him, Who art thou? And Jesus saith unto them, Even the same...Another instance of identity inquiry

John 1 verses

John 1 22 Meaning

John 1:22 depicts the Jerusalem delegation's persistent demand for John the Baptist's specific identity, following his denials of being the Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet. Their inquiry was not one of curiosity but an official requirement to report a clear designation to those who sent them, revealing their need to categorize and understand John's public ministry within their established religious framework.

John 1 22 Context

The immediate context of John 1:22 is the formal delegation sent from Jerusalem's religious leadership (the "Jews," specifically priests and Levites) to John the Baptist in Bethany beyond the Jordan. This inquiry, detailed from verse 19 onwards, stems from John's public baptizing ministry and the speculation surrounding his identity. In verses 19-21, John clearly denies being the Christ, Elijah, or the long-awaited Prophet. Verse 22 records the delegation's increasing impatience and their demand for a positive declaration of his identity, driven by their official mandate to report back to the Sanhedrin or chief authorities in Jerusalem.

Historically, Jewish society at this time anticipated the arrival of the Messiah, or the return of Elijah before the Messiah, or the 'Prophet' foretold by Moses. The religious authorities were tasked with upholding mosaic law and order, and any significant religious movement, especially one involving a figure gaining popular attention, would warrant an official investigation to determine its legitimacy and avoid perceived heresy or political instability that might invite Roman intervention. Their questions reflect an administrative need to classify John, rather than a genuine spiritual curiosity about God's new work.

John 1 22 Word analysis

  • "Then" (Τότε, Tote): A temporal adverb signifying a transition or consequence, indicating the delegation's continued interrogation following John's prior denials. It marks a decisive shift in their questioning, moving from speculation to an insistent demand.

  • "said they" (εἶπαν, eipan): Refers to the delegation of priests and Levites mentioned in John 1:19. Their speech is authoritative and reflects the official nature of their mission, not merely private inquiry.

  • "unto him" (αὐτῷ, autō): Directly addressing John the Baptist.

  • "Who art thou?" (Σὺ τίς εἶ;, Sy tis ei?): A direct, emphatic question demanding self-identification. The use of "Σὺ" (you, singular) stresses the personal nature of the inquiry after John's earlier categorical denials (of being Christ, Elijah, or the Prophet).

  • "that we may give an answer" (ἵνα ἀπόκρισιν δῶμεν, hina apokrisin dōmen): A purpose clause, clearly stating the immediate objective of their interrogation: to obtain a formal, definite reply. "Ἀπόκρισις" (apokrisis) signifies a definitive legal or official response.

  • "to them that sent us" (τοῖς πέμψαντας ἡμᾶς, tois pempsantas hēmas): Refers to the powerful religious council or authorities in Jerusalem (likely the Sanhedrin) who dispatched this delegation. This emphasizes the hierarchical accountability and the seriousness of the situation.

  • "What sayest thou of thyself?" (Τί λέγεις περὶ σεαυτοῦ;, Ti legeis peri seautou?): This rephrased question is even more demanding, compelling John to offer a personal testimony or witness about his own identity and role. "Περὶ σεαυτοῦ" (peri seautou), "concerning yourself," puts the burden of definition squarely on John.

  • Words-group Analysis:

    • "Then said they unto him, Who art thou?": This sequence demonstrates the delegation's frustration and need for a definitive statement after John's previous denials. They want a concrete label to place him.
    • "that we may give an answer to them that sent us.": This highlights the bureaucratic and authoritative dimension of their inquiry. They are emissaries under direct command, requiring a specific report, indicating accountability to their superiors.
    • "What sayest thou of thyself?": This is the climax of their interrogation, pushing John for a personal, self-declared identity. It reflects a rabbinic-style inquiry, where one's self-testimony could be crucial, yet also subject to scrutiny.

John 1 22 Bonus section

  • The repetitive and increasingly direct nature of the delegation's questions ("Who art thou?," "Art thou Elias?", "Art thou that prophet?", and then "What sayest thou of thyself?") illustrates a human tendency to persist in categorizing divine activity within pre-established expectations rather than being open to new revelation.
  • The implied political and religious pressures on the Jerusalem authorities likely contributed to their urgency in investigating John. A charismatic figure gathering a following could be perceived as a threat to their religious control or a spark for Roman suppression, hence the demand for a clear, reportable identity.
  • John's consistent refusal to claim any glory or title for himself, despite the insistent questioning, serves as a powerful model of humility and faithfully directing all attention towards the coming Christ, thereby embodying his mission as merely a "voice."

John 1 22 Commentary

John 1:22 reveals the persistent human desire, especially within established religious structures, to categorize and control spiritual manifestations. Following John the Baptist's humble and unequivocal denials of prominent messianic and prophetic roles, the delegation from Jerusalem escalates its questioning. They are not merely curious; they have been sent on an official mission to obtain a verifiable "answer" regarding John's identity, which they can formally report to their superiors. The insistence, "What sayest thou of thyself?", underscores their frustration and demand for a direct, self-defining statement. This highlights a critical tension: the religious institution seeks to define God's servant based on human categories and expectations, while God's plan often operates beyond such confines, as John's subsequent testimony (Jn 1:23) will show, directing attention away from himself to Christ. This moment illustrates the struggle between human attempts to systematize the divine and the sovereign, unexpected ways God works.