Job 20 1

Job 20:1 kjv

Then answered Zophar the Naamathite, and said,

Job 20:1 nkjv

Then Zophar the Naamathite answered and said:

Job 20:1 niv

Then Zophar the Naamathite replied:

Job 20:1 esv

Then Zophar the Naamathite answered and said:

Job 20:1 nlt

Then Zophar the Naamathite replied:

Job 20 verses

Job 20 1 Meaning

This verse initiates Zophar the Naamathite's final and most vehement discourse directed at Job. It signifies his turn in the ongoing debate, preparing the audience for a speech filled with dogmatic assertions regarding the inevitable, swift downfall of the wicked and, by implication, Job's own supposed hidden transgressions as the cause of his intense suffering. It functions as a clear marker in the narrative progression of the dialogue between Job and his three companions.

Job 20 1 Context

Job chapter 20 opens with Zophar's response, following Job's powerful and deeply personal lament in chapter 19. In his preceding discourse, Job had expressed his profound anguish over his suffering, felt utterly abandoned by God and man, yet he remarkably declared his unwavering hope in a living Redeemer who would vindicate him beyond death. Zophar, however, entirely bypasses Job's spiritual declaration and prophetic insight. Instead, his speech is a direct continuation of the friends' traditional retribution theology, asserting that the wicked, even if seemingly prosperous, will surely meet a swift and dreadful end. This perspective served as their constant accusation against Job, presuming his unconfessed sin despite his repeated declarations of innocence. The historical and cultural context underscores that this form of "wisdom" was prevalent in the ancient Near East, where a direct correlation between piety and prosperity (or sin and suffering) was a dominant paradigm. The book of Job directly challenges this simplistic view, exposing its inadequacy when applied dogmatically and without understanding of divine sovereignty beyond human comprehension. Zophar, here, represents the peak of this unyielding, conventional theology that the book implicitly refutes.

Job 20 1 Word analysis

• Then (וַיַּעַן - wayya‘an, from עָנָה - anah "to answer"): This conjunctive verb indicates a direct response to Job's previous words. It’s a common biblical narrative transition, signifying the next speaker's entry into the dialogue. It also suggests Zophar felt a strong need to speak, rather than remaining silent or listening further.
• Zophar (צוֹפַר - Tzophar): One of Job's three friends who came to comfort him. His name is believed to mean "sparrow" or "chirping," possibly hinting at his characteristic blunt, often abrupt, and rather short-sighted pronouncements. He is consistently dogmatic in his speeches, adhering strictly to a rigid system of divine retribution.
• the Naamathite (הַנַּעֲמָתִי - han-na‘amati): This geographic identifier denotes Zophar's place of origin, Naamah. While the exact location is debated, it is often placed in the region of Edom or northwest Arabia, areas historically associated with ancient Near Eastern wisdom traditions. This detail grounds the characters in their historical setting but offers no direct theological interpretation.
• answered (וַיַּעַן - wayya‘an): A repetition of the verbal root used with "Then," emphasizing the interactive nature of the ongoing conversation. It means to speak in reply, to respond. It highlights that Zophar is engaging directly with Job's latest lament and self-defense.
• and said (וַיֹּאמֶר - wayyō’mer): A common Hebrew formula introducing direct speech in biblical narrative. It formally opens Zophar's forthcoming address. It signals the transition from narrative description to the exact words that will follow, indicating the beginning of his spoken words.

• "Then Zophar the Naamathite answered and said": This entire introductory phrase is a conventional narrative construction in the Hebrew Bible. It serves multiple purposes: marking the transition between speakers, identifying the speaker and his origin, and formalizing the beginning of his verbal response. It suggests Zophar's urgency and readiness to deliver his perspective, which will dominate the entire chapter. This clause establishes Zophar's re-entry into the dialogue as a respondent to Job, carrying with it the theological framework that will shape his entire argument against Job's perceived innocence.

Job 20 1 Bonus section

• This verse subtly marks a turning point in the dialogues: while there will be a third cycle of speeches, it will be notably abbreviated. After Zophar finishes this discourse, Bildad will offer a very brief speech in chapter 25, and Eliphaz will not present a full third argument. This decreasing length and participation signify the intellectual and perhaps emotional exhaustion of Job's friends, as their arguments against Job's integrity weaken or run dry, having failed to convince Job or truly explain his plight. Zophar’s full-length speech here is his final substantial contribution to the debate.
• Zophar’s speech, launched in this verse, is unique in its intense focus purely on the fate of the wicked, devoid of any counsel to Job on repentance. This differentiates him slightly from Eliphaz (who suggested seeking God) and Bildad (who encouraged turning to God). Zophar is dogmatically preoccupied with upholding his rigid, retribution theology rather than offering genuine spiritual guidance to Job, highlighting his limited perspective.

Job 20 1 Commentary

Job 20:1 acts purely as a narrative pivot, signaling the commencement of Zophar's final discourse. Far from offering any fresh insights or compassionate understanding in response to Job's deeply moving declarations in chapter 19, Zophar will, in the verses that follow, relentlessly hammer home the conventional belief that the wicked always suffer swift and comprehensive destruction. His speech is characterized by unyielding certainty and lack of empathy, focusing on universal principles of retribution which, though true in their broader sense regarding sin and its consequences, are rigidly misapplied to Job's unique suffering. This verse sets the stage for a continuation of the flawed arguments presented by Job's friends, failing to engage with Job's cry for vindication and demonstrating the limitations of human wisdom when confronting divine mystery. It reinforces the central tension of the book: the apparent conflict between God's justice and the righteous Job's inexplicable suffering.