Job 11 3

Job 11:3 kjv

Should thy lies make men hold their peace? and when thou mockest, shall no man make thee ashamed?

Job 11:3 nkjv

Should your empty talk make men hold their peace? And when you mock, should no one rebuke you?

Job 11:3 niv

Will your idle talk reduce others to silence? Will no one rebuke you when you mock?

Job 11:3 esv

Should your babble silence men, and when you mock, shall no one shame you?

Job 11:3 nlt

Should I remain silent while you babble on?
When you mock God, shouldn't someone make you ashamed?

Job 11 verses

Job 11 3 Meaning

Job 11:3 captures Zophar the Naamathite's accusatory response to Job's impassioned defenses. Zophar rhetorically questions Job's bold speech, suggesting that Job's constant boasting and perceived mockery should not go unchallenged. He believes Job's words are excessive, unwarranted, and designed to silence others while escaping any accountability or shame for his own pronouncements. This verse highlights Zophar's conviction that Job's suffering is a direct consequence of his hidden sin, and his current speech only compounds his offense in Zophar's eyes.

Job 11 3 Context

Job 11:3 is part of Zophar the Naamathite's first speech to Job, immediately following Job's indignant reply in chapters 9 and 10. Zophar is the third of Job's friends to speak, and his approach is the most harsh and dogmatic. Like Eliphaz and Bildad, Zophar operates from the standard retribution theology prevalent in that era: good people prosper, evil people suffer. Since Job is suffering intensely, Zophar's unyielding logic dictates that Job must be profoundly wicked, even if his sin is hidden.

Zophar is outraged by Job's persistent declarations of innocence and his lamentations that seem to question God's justice and wisdom. He views Job's speech not as sincere anguish or righteous protest, but as boastful, arrogant, and outright mocking of both the friends' counsel and, implicitly, God Himself. Zophar believes Job's extensive and loud defense of himself is an attempt to silence dissenting voices and escape divine consequences. Chapter 11 sets forth Zophar's view of God as an unsearchable yet just judge who is beyond reproach and punishes wickedness directly, urging Job to confess his assumed iniquity to find relief.

Job 11 3 Word analysis

• Should your boastings:
  • Boastings (Hebrew: בַּדִּים - baddim): This term carries the connotation of "empty talk," "idle chatter," "vain words," or even "ravings." Zophar isn't accusing Job of merely bragging but of engaging in hollow, unsubstantial, and perhaps blasphemous speech that lacks truth or wisdom. It highlights Zophar's dismissal of Job's heartfelt lament as meaningless noise.
• make men hold their peace?
  • This phrase captures Zophar's frustration. He feels Job's incessant and self-justifying speech overwhelms the conversation, preventing others (like the friends) from offering their counsel or divine truths. It implies Job's speech is overbearing and monopolizing, silencing rightful admonition.
• And when you mock,
  • Mock (Hebrew: לָעַג - la'ag): This word signifies "to scoff," "deride," "treat with contempt," or "ridicule." Zophar accuses Job of not just arguing but actively holding him and possibly God in contempt through his challenges. It suggests an attitude of scorn towards Zophar's and perhaps divine authority. This accusation is serious, as mocking the righteous or God carries strong condemnation in the Bible.
• shall no one make you ashamed?
  • Ashamed (Hebrew: כָּלַם - kalam): To be humiliated, disgraced, confounded, or put to shame. This rhetorical question expresses Zophar's indignation. He implies that Job's arrogant speech and accusations should naturally lead to him feeling disgraced or rebuked. Since Job shows no sign of shame, Zophar believes it is his duty to inflict that shame, expecting Job to finally recognize his error and humble himself.

Job 11 3 Bonus section

The Hebrew word for "boastings" (baddim) can also carry the nuance of "fabrications" or "deceptive utterances," further intensifying Zophar's accusation against Job. He is not just talking too much, but speaking untruths. This deepens Zophar's judgment that Job's speech is fundamentally flawed and an affront. This verse, therefore, captures the essence of Zophar's flawed hermeneutic, where Job's perceived impertinence is treated as further proof of his hidden sin, rather than acknowledging the possibility of righteous suffering. The irony is that later in the book, God Himself rebukes Job's friends for not speaking what is right about Him, in contrast to Job (Job 42:7-8), thus undermining Zophar's entire argument presented here.

Job 11 3 Commentary

Job 11:3 is a harsh articulation of Zophar's black-and-white theology. He cannot comprehend Job's suffering as anything other than a consequence of severe sin, despite Job's protests. His words expose his dogmatism and lack of empathy, viewing Job's laments and declarations of innocence as intolerable insolence. Zophar perceives Job's robust self-defense not as legitimate argumentation but as arrogant, empty talk (boasting) that tries to dominate the discussion and mock the very notion of divine justice. His rhetorical questions are a thinly veiled demand for Job to cease his protests, accept his assumed guilt, and, by extension, allow God's retribution to be affirmed. This verse exemplifies the fundamental conflict in Job: the friends' rigid adherence to retribution theology versus Job's plea for vindication and a direct encounter with God, despite his profound suffering. It reflects how readily human certainty can override compassionate understanding when faced with suffering that defies simplistic theological explanations.