Genesis 36 37

Genesis 36:37 kjv

And Samlah died, and Saul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.

Genesis 36:37 nkjv

And when Samlah died, Saul of Rehoboth-by-the-River reigned in his place.

Genesis 36:37 niv

When Samlah died, Shaul from Rehoboth on the river succeeded him as king.

Genesis 36:37 esv

Samlah died, and Shaul of Rehoboth on the Euphrates reigned in his place.

Genesis 36:37 nlt

When Samlah died, Shaul from the city of Rehoboth-on-the-River became king in his place.

Genesis 36 verses

Genesis 36 37 meaning

Genesis 36:37 details a specific event within the Edomite lineage: the death of Samlah of Masrekah and the succession of Shaul of Rehoboth by the River as king in his place. This verse is a precise historical record, continuing the enumeration of Edom's early kings who reigned before any king reigned over the Israelites. It highlights the structured, hereditary nature of the Edomite monarchy during that period.

Genesis 36 37 Context

Genesis 36 provides an extensive genealogy of Esau (Edom), detailing his descendants, their wives, chieftains, and particularly a list of kings who reigned in Edom "before any king reigned over the children of Israel" (Gen 36:31). This chapter emphasizes the fulfillment of God's promise to Abraham that he would be the father of many nations and kings (Gen 17:6), here shown through Esau's line. The inclusion of this detailed record validates the historicity of the narratives and shows the distinct, parallel development of the Edomite nation alongside the emerging nation of Israel. Verse 37 specifically marks another transition in the Edomite succession, maintaining the precise historical and chronological flow of these genealogies. It provides insight into the structured society of Edom with its established monarchical system long before Israel itself had a king.

Genesis 36 37 Word analysis

• And Samlah died,
  • And Samlah: `וַיָּמָת שַׂמְלָה` (vay-yâmot Śamlâh). Samlah (שַׂמְלָה) is a proper noun, identifying a specific king of Edom from the city of Masrekah. His name means "garment" or "robe", though this likely holds no deeper theological significance in this context beyond identification.
  • died: `וַיָּמָת` (vay-yâmot), from the root `מוּת` (muth), meaning "to die". This word signifies the end of a physical life and, in the context of a ruler, the end of a reign. Its presence is factual, denoting transition. Biblically, death is the universal appointment for all humanity (Heb 9:27), contrasting with God's eternal nature (Psa 90:2).
• and Shaul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.
  • and Shaul: `וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו שָׁאוּל` (vay-yimlokh tachtav Shâ'ûl). Shaul (שָׁאוּל) is a proper noun. The name means "asked" or "requested", common in the ancient world. While the name is famously associated with the first Israelite king (1 Sam 9:2), this Shaul is a distinct Edomite king. This highlights that names were often reused, carrying no inherent prophetic link unless specified.
  • of Rehoboth: `רְחֹבוֹת` (Rechovot). This refers to Rehoboth-Nahar, distinguishing it from other places named Rehoboth (e.g., Isaac's well, Gen 26:22). Rehoboth means "wide places" or "broad ways". It is a geographical identifier, confirming the specificity of the record.
  • by the river: `הַנָּהָר` (ha-nâhâr). `נָהָר` (nahâr) means "river". This precise geographical qualifier further identifies Shaul's origin. Scholars often debate if this refers to the Euphrates, or more likely, a local river/wadi prominent in the region of Edom. It underscores the precise nature of the Biblical historical record.
  • reigned in his stead: `וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו` (vay-yimlokh tachtav). `מָלַךְ` (malakh) means "to reign, to be king". `תַּחְתָּיו` (tachtav) means "under him" or "in his place/stead". This phrase is standard for succession in a monarchy. It indicates continuity of kingship and order, implying a lineage or established system of rule. This reflects God's allowance of human authority and governance, even outside the direct covenantal line of Israel (Rom 13:1).
• Word-Group Analysis
  • "Samlah died, and...reigned in his stead": This common biblical formula for royal succession (found throughout Kings and Chronicles) signifies the end of one earthly reign and the beginning of another. It reminds readers of the transient nature of human power, contrasting it with God's eternal dominion (Psa 145:13).
  • "Shaul of Rehoboth by the river": The precise geographical identification attached to these kings' names (Samlah of Masrekah in previous verses, Shaul of Rehoboth here) lends authenticity and detail to the historical record, indicating specific, localized authorities rather than generic, abstract rulers. This attention to detail speaks to the inspired truthfulness of the scripture.

Genesis 36 37 Bonus section

The inclusion of detailed genealogies and king lists for Edom serves multiple purposes beyond simple historical fact-checking. First, it emphasizes the literal fulfillment of prophecies related to Abraham's numerous descendants and kings emerging from them (Gen 17:6; 35:11), validating God's word. Second, by presenting Edom's established kingdom before Israel had a king (Gen 36:31), the text highlights the distinct paths of the two brothers, Jacob and Esau. Edom quickly became a political entity, while Israel's formation into a nation, initially as a divinely-led tribal confederacy, unfolded differently before eventually establishing a monarchy. This detailed, seemingly "mundane" historical information speaks to the comprehensiveness and trustworthiness of God's Word, which accurately records the destinies of all nations, even those outside the direct Abrahamic covenant, underscoring that all of history operates under divine oversight (Acts 17:26).

Genesis 36 37 Commentary

Genesis 36:37 serves as a continued brick in the wall of Edom's dynastic record. While seemingly a simple statement of death and succession, its placement within Genesis emphasizes God's sovereign hand not just in the lineage of promise (Jacob/Israel), but also in the detailed historical unfolding of other nations. The meticulous naming of kings and their cities reinforces the historicity and accuracy of the biblical narrative. It reveals a divinely ordered world where even the rulers of non-covenant people are part of a recorded progression. This verse, like the surrounding chapter, implicitly demonstrates that Esau's descendants indeed became a powerful kingdom with established governance long before Israel sought a human king, fulfilling prophetic implications (Gen 25:23). It sets a tangible historical backdrop against which the later interactions between Israel and Edom (e.g., refusal of passage in Numbers) can be understood. It also subtly prepares the reader for the later distinctions and conflicts between these two distinct nations.