Genesis 36 35

Genesis 36:35 kjv

And Husham died, and Hadad the son of Bedad, who smote Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his stead: and the name of his city was Avith.

Genesis 36:35 nkjv

And when Husham died, Hadad the son of Bedad, who attacked Midian in the field of Moab, reigned in his place. And the name of his city was Avith.

Genesis 36:35 niv

When Husham died, Hadad son of Bedad, who defeated Midian in the country of Moab, succeeded him as king. His city was named Avith.

Genesis 36:35 esv

Husham died, and Hadad the son of Bedad, who defeated Midian in the country of Moab, reigned in his place, the name of his city being Avith.

Genesis 36:35 nlt

When Husham died, Hadad son of Bedad became king in his place and ruled from the city of Avith. He was the one who defeated the Midianites in the land of Moab.

Genesis 36 verses

Genesis 36 35 meaning

Genesis chapter 36, verse 35 details the succession of kings in Edom, specifically identifying Hadad, son of Bedad, as the one who succeeded Husham. The verse highlights Hadad's military accomplishment in defeating Midian in the land of Moab, an event that likely legitimized his rule. It also records the name of his capital city, Avith. This information is part of a list of Edomite kings who reigned before any king reigned over the Israelites, providing a historical record of the descendants of Esau.

Genesis 36 35 Context

Genesis chapter 36 primarily consists of genealogies and king lists related to Esau and his descendants, the Edomites. This specific chapter outlines the progression of the Edomite lineage, tribal chiefs, and kings, contrasting with the focus on Jacob's lineage (Israel) in the subsequent chapters. Genesis 36:31-39 specifically provides a sequence of eight kings who reigned in Edom before the establishment of Israelite kingship. This particular verse, Genesis 36:35, records one such succession: Husham's death and Hadad son of Bedad taking the throne. The mention of Hadad's victory over Midian in Moab likely signifies a notable event in Edomite history, perhaps an expansion of their influence or securing trade routes, and serves to legitimize Hadad's reign by showcasing his strength and military prowess. Historically and culturally, the defeat of rivals like Midian would have been a significant marker for any ancient Near Eastern ruler, establishing their authority. This pre-Israelite kingship subtly underscores the unique divine plan for Israel's kingship, which was distinct from the surrounding nations' succession patterns based solely on human strength or lineage.

Genesis 36 35 Word analysis

• When Husham died:
  • Simple declaration of fact. Standard way to indicate the end of one king's reign.
  • 'Husham' (חוּשָׁם, Chusham) means "hastiness" or "speed."
  • It points to the transient nature of human rule, highlighting that earthly authority is temporary.
• Hadad:
  • (הֲדָד, Hadad) A common Semitic personal name, potentially related to the Syrian storm god Hadad.
  • This name appears in other biblical contexts (e.g., a foe of Solomon from Edom in 1 Kings 11:14). This early Edomite king bearing the name foreshadows later tensions between Edom and Israel, particularly those connected to Hadad of royal Edomite lineage who troubled Solomon.
  • His name being Hadad is not a direct polemic against a deity, but rather, in the broader biblical narrative, it implicitly contrasts the strength associated with earthly deities or human kings with the omnipotence of the God of Israel.
• son of Bedad:
  • (בְּדָד, Bedad) Meaning "alone" or "single," suggesting unique origins or perhaps an orphan status if not his actual father's name.
  • Patrilineal identification was crucial for legitimacy and identity in ancient Near Eastern societies.
• who defeated Midian:
  • 'Defeated' (מַכֶּה, makkeh): Literally "he who struck" or "smiting." Indicates a decisive military victory.
  • 'Midian' (מִדְיָן, Midyan): A significant people, descendants of Abraham through Keturah (Gen 25:2), who later had prominent interactions with Israel, sometimes hostile (Numbers 25, Judges 6-8), and sometimes cooperative (Moses' father-in-law Jethro).
  • For an Edomite king to defeat Midian signals his strength and power in a specific regional conflict. It suggests Hadad's military prowess as a key reason for his kingship.
• in the country of Moab:
  • (מוֹאָב, Mo'av) A region and people, descendants of Lot (Gen 19:37), historically neighboring Edom and Israel, often in conflict or alliance with various groups.
  • This geographical detail situates the military victory and reveals the wider geopolitical landscape. It indicates Edomite influence or campaigning sphere extended into Moabite territory, highlighting their regional power.
• succeeded him as king:
  • (וַיִּמְלֹךְ, vayyimlokh) "And he reigned." Clear statement of succession and enthronement.
  • Reinforces the established system of monarchy in Edom, prior to Israel’s, demonstrating Edom had political structure.
• The name of his city was Avith:
  • 'Avith' (עֲוִית, Avith) meaning "ruins" or "perversity."
  • Naming the capital city is common in king lists, grounding the ruler in a specific location and demonstrating the scope of their domain. This detail makes the king and his reign historically tangible.

Words-group analysis:

• "When Husham died, Hadad son of Bedad...": This phrase introduces the change of leadership, emphasizing that one rule ends and another begins. It’s a standard formula for royal succession. It points to the divinely permitted transience of human authority.
• "who defeated Midian in the country of Moab...": This details the specific achievement that likely solidified Hadad's claim to the throne, underscoring the importance of military victory and territorial influence for establishing power in the ancient Near East. The detail about Midian in Moab is an early example of the complex inter-tribal politics that will feature heavily in Israel's history. It foreshadows Midian and Moab as potential threats or areas of conflict.

Genesis 36 35 Bonus section

• Genealogical vs. Historical Lists: Genesis 36 transitions from purely genealogical lists (fathers, sons) to more historical king lists (kings, their city, what happened at their succession). This reflects an early form of historical record-keeping, emphasizing the significance of these rulers and their domains.
• Polemic by Contrast: While not directly a polemic, the structured presentation of Edomite kings contrasts with the delayed and distinct establishment of Israelite kingship (centuries later). It subtly reminds the reader that Israel’s kingship was part of a covenantal, divine plan, not merely an organic development from a confederacy of chiefs or a rise from military strongmen, as may have been the case for Edom.
• Anticipation of Future Conflict: The mention of Midian and Moab as areas of Edomite conflict hints at the later, far more extensive and divinely orchestrated conflicts between Israel and these very peoples (e.g., Midian in Judges 6-8; Moab in Numbers 22-25, 2 Samuel 8).
• Edom's Independence: This verse, and indeed the entire Edomite king list in Genesis 36, shows that Edom enjoyed a period of robust, independent monarchy. This independence later wanes significantly, with Edom becoming a vassal or being absorbed, illustrating the fluctuating fortunes of human kingdoms versus God's eternal Kingdom.

Genesis 36 35 Commentary

Genesis 36:35 provides a concise record of one of Edom’s early kings. Far from being a mere genealogical entry, it offers a glimpse into the socio-political realities of a neighboring nation that pre-dated Israel’s own monarchy. The military exploit of Hadad against Midian, occurring in Moabite territory, points to the dynamic, often conflict-ridden environment in which these early kingdoms operated. This victory likely secured Hadad’s position and prestige, emphasizing the role of strength and strategic success in ancient kingship.

This verse subtly sets the stage for future interactions: Edom’s consistent presence as a distinct kingdom (though frequently adversarial towards Israel), and Midian’s recurring role as a foe. While the verse is an external, factual record for the reader, within the broader biblical narrative, the focus on Edomite kings who "reigned before any king reigned over the Israelites" serves as a narrative counterpoint. It implicitly highlights God’s sovereign timing and unique purpose for Israel's monarchy, which would be initiated much later under different divine instructions, and ultimately points to God as the true King over all nations.