Genesis 33:2 kjv
And he put the handmaids and their children foremost, and Leah and her children after, and Rachel and Joseph hindermost.
Genesis 33:2 nkjv
And he put the maidservants and their children in front, Leah and her children behind, and Rachel and Joseph last.
Genesis 33:2 niv
He put the female servants and their children in front, Leah and her children next, and Rachel and Joseph in the rear.
Genesis 33:2 esv
And he put the servants with their children in front, then Leah with her children, and Rachel and Joseph last of all.
Genesis 33:2 nlt
He put the servant wives and their children at the front, Leah and her children next, and Rachel and Joseph last.
Genesis 33 2 Cross References
Verse | Text | Reference Note |
---|---|---|
Gen 32:7-8 | Then Jacob was greatly afraid and distressed... and he divided the people. | Jacob's initial fear leading to defensive strategies. |
Gen 32:11 | Deliver me, I pray thee, from the hand of my brother, from the hand of Esau. | Jacob's prayer reflecting his profound fear. |
Gen 29:30 | And he loved also Rachel more than Leah... | Jacob's preferential love for Rachel, explaining her placement. |
Gen 37:3 | Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children... | Jacob's deep affection for Joseph, underscoring his protection. |
Prov 22:3 | A prudent man foresees evil and hides himself... | Echoes Jacob's wisdom in foreseeing potential danger. |
Prov 27:12 | A prudent man foresees danger and takes refuge, but the simple keep going. | Similar to Prov 22:3, highlighting strategic wisdom. |
Matt 2:13 | The angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph... Take the young child... flee. | Protection of the most valuable in danger, similar to Joseph. |
Exod 12:37 | And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses... in order. | The concept of orderly progression for large groups. |
Num 10:14 | ...the standard of the camp of the children of Judah first... | Instances of ordered marching/movement in scripture. |
Judg 7:19-22 | Gideon and the 300 broke their pitchers, shouting... | Strategic battle formations and surprise. |
1 Sam 30:2-3 | Ziklag was burned with fire; and their wives, and their sons, and their daughters were taken. | Protecting family from danger is paramount. |
Isa 40:11 | He shall feed his flock like a shepherd: he shall gather the lambs... carry them. | Divine protection akin to a shepherd, Jacob's role as patriarch. |
Ps 23:4 | Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil. | While Jacob acts, there's underlying trust in divine care. |
Prov 18:10 | The name of the Lord is a strong tower; the righteous run into it and are safe. | Jacob’s human strategy works in tandem with his prayer and trust. |
Neh 4:13-14 | Therefore I stationed some of the people... according to their families... fight for your brothers. | Protecting family members in vulnerable positions. |
Deut 20:5-9 | Instructions for war: Who has built a house and not dedicated it? | Placing those with a direct interest/vulnerability first. |
John 10:11-12 | I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. | Christ as the ultimate protector; Jacob shows paternal care. |
1 Tim 5:8 | But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household. | A practical display of providing for one's household. |
1 Pet 5:2 | Shepherd the flock of God that is among you... | Pastoral care and protection for the "flock" in leadership. |
Phil 2:4 | Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. | Jacob prioritizing others (even selectively) over himself. |
Gen 45:10 | You shall dwell in the land of Goshen, and you shall be near to me. | Future protective care of Joseph for his family in Egypt. |
Deut 8:16 | ...who fed thee in the wilderness with manna, which thy fathers knew not. | God's protective provision for His people. |
Ps 91:4 | He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust. | A picture of divine protection, mirrored in Jacob's actions. |
Genesis 33 verses
Genesis 33 2 Meaning
Genesis 33:2 describes Jacob's strategic arrangement of his family in three distinct groups as he approached Esau, reflecting both a pragmatic safety measure and the hierarchy of his affection. He placed the handmaids and their children first, then Leah and her children, and finally Rachel and his beloved son Joseph in the safest, hindermost position, anticipating potential danger from Esau and aiming to protect those he valued most.
Genesis 33 2 Context
Genesis 33:2 occurs immediately before Jacob's face-to-face encounter with his estranged brother Esau, after twenty years apart. Jacob had just spent the night wrestling with a divine being, resulting in his blessing and a new name, Israel. Despite this spiritual encounter, his practical fear of Esau, fueled by their fraught past and Esau's likely larger armed retinue, remained palpable (Gen 32:7, 11). Chapter 32 culminates in Jacob sending numerous gifts ahead as appeasement. This verse shows Jacob implementing a calculated protective strategy for his vast household, which included wives, children, and servants, along with numerous flocks and herds. His precise arrangement of family members reveals a pragmatic assessment of risk and a hierarchical valuing of his wives and children. It is a moment of intense anticipation, where spiritual promises meet earthly peril.
Genesis 33 2 Word analysis
- And he put (וַיָּשֶׂם - vayyasem): A Hifil verb, implying a causative and deliberate action. Jacob actively "placed" or "set" his family. It conveys intentionality and agency in his strategic arrangement, not a casual or spontaneous grouping.
- the handmaids (הַשְּׁפָחֹות - hashshᵉphachot): Refers to Bilhah and Zilpah, the maidservants of Rachel and Leah, respectively, who bore children to Jacob (Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher). In the social hierarchy, they had the lowest status among Jacob's wives, and their children were often viewed through their mothers' status.
- and their children (וְאֶת־יַלְדֵיהֶן - v'et-yaldeyhen): Refers to the sons born to Bilhah and Zilpah. Placing them "foremost" indicates they were the most expendable in a worst-case scenario, sadly reflecting their societal status and Jacob's prioritization of his primary wives and sons.
- foremost (רִאשֹׁנָה - rishonah): Literally "first" or "at the head." This position would bear the brunt of any initial aggression from Esau, making them the most vulnerable.
- and Leah (וְאֶת־לֵאָה - v'et-le'ah): Jacob's first wife, but the less beloved (Gen 29:30). She had six sons and one daughter (Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, and Dinah).
- and her children (וְאֶת־יְלָדֶיהָ - v'et-yeladeyha): Refers to the offspring of Leah. Placed "next," their position was safer than the handmaids' but still more exposed than Rachel's group.
- next (אַחֲרֹונִים - acharonim): Literally "last ones" or "those who follow," but in context with "foremost" and "hindermost," it signifies the intermediate position. They were "behind" the foremost group, moving with the main body.
- and Rachel (וְאֶת־רָחֵל - v'et-rachel): Jacob's deeply beloved wife (Gen 29:30), for whom he worked 14 years.
- and Joseph (וְאֶת־יוֹסֵף - v'et-yoseph): Rachel's firstborn son, Jacob's eleventh son but his most beloved (Gen 37:3).
- hindermost (אַחֲרֹונִים - acharonim): Literally "last ones" or "those at the back." This placement provided the greatest protection, as they would be farthest from any initial attack, reflecting Jacob's immense love and desire to preserve them.
Words-group by words-group analysis:
- "he put the handmaids and their children foremost": This initial grouping highlights the societal hierarchy and the vulnerability of those with lower status. Jacob places them as a first line, either to absorb a potential attack or to serve as a peace offering/diversion. It's a calculated risk with those considered less vital to his direct lineage/personal affections.
- "and Leah and her children next": Leah's group represents the main body of Jacob's immediate family. Their placement reflects an intermediate level of protection. While they are his primary wife and most of his children, they are not afforded the absolute maximal protection reserved for his ultimate preference.
- "and Rachel and Joseph hindermost": This grouping clearly demonstrates Jacob's deepest emotional attachments and priorities. Placing Rachel and her only surviving son Joseph in the most protected position speaks volumes about his love, their value to him, and his determination to ensure their survival above all others. This echoes Jacob's disproportionate affection (Gen 29:30; 37:3) and sets the stage for future events concerning Joseph's importance.
Genesis 33 2 Bonus section
Jacob's arrangement is not just about protection from Esau; it's also a demonstration of his stewardship over his "house" as a patriarch. He bears the primary responsibility for the well-being and continuation of his lineage, which holds immense importance for the covenant promises. The distinction made between the wives and their children foreshadows the varying destinies and significance of their descendants within the nation of Israel. For example, Judah (Leah's son) would lead the prominent tribe, but Joseph would become the pivotal figure for their survival in Egypt. Jacob's action also signifies a transition from the cunning "supplanter" to a responsible, if still humanly flawed, family head and father of a nation, who despite receiving a blessing from God still takes diligent earthly precautions. This balance of faith and responsibility is a crucial lesson embedded in this concise verse.
Genesis 33 2 Commentary
Genesis 33:2 is a profound snapshot of Jacob's character and his approach to challenges. Despite his recent divine encounter and the renaming to Israel, the old Jacob, pragmatic, strategic, and acutely aware of potential dangers, is still very much present. His meticulous arrangement of his family is a testament to his fear of Esau, but also to his immense love, particularly for Rachel and Joseph. This is not just a tactical decision for survival; it's a window into Jacob's heart and his family's dynamics.
The placement reveals a stark hierarchy: the handmaids and their children (Bilhah and Zilpah's offspring) are deemed most expendable, followed by Leah and her children, while Rachel and Joseph, the most beloved, are shielded at the very back. This calculated risk and display of preferential love would have been well understood in the patriarchal culture, where the protection of favored lines was paramount. It’s a moment where human prudence meets impending confrontation. Jacob had prayed fervently (Gen 32:9-12), acknowledging God's promises. Yet, he does not merely wait passively; he exercises practical wisdom and takes all human precautions he deems necessary. This blending of reliance on God's word with shrewd human action is a recurring theme in biblical narratives. The verse therefore portrays Jacob not as perfect, but as a complex leader, both spiritual and profoundly human, striving to navigate peril with the best of his abilities while safeguarding his most precious treasures.