Genesis 32:8 kjv

And said, If Esau come to the one company, and smite it, then the other company which is left shall escape.

Genesis 32:8 nkjv

And he said, "If Esau comes to the one company and attacks it, then the other company which is left will escape."

Genesis 32:8 niv

He thought, "If Esau comes and attacks one group, the group that is left may escape."

Genesis 32:8 esv

thinking, "If Esau comes to the one camp and attacks it, then the camp that is left will escape."

Genesis 32:8 nlt

He thought, "If Esau meets one group and attacks it, perhaps the other group can escape."

Genesis 32 verses

Genesis 32 8 Meaning

Genesis chapter 32, verse 8 depicts Jacob's strategic response to the impending confrontation with his brother Esau, whom he feared would attack him. Faced with news that Esau was coming with four hundred men, Jacob divided his entire traveling company – the people, flocks, herds, and camels – into two distinct camps. His intent was to establish a contingency plan: should Esau attack and destroy one camp, the other camp would have a chance to escape and survive. This act reveals Jacob's fear, his tactical shrewdness, and his reliance on human strategy alongside, or perhaps initially above, full trust in God's promises.

Genesis 32 8 Context

Genesis chapter 32 finds Jacob returning to Canaan after 20 years away with Laban. He is heading back to confront his past and reconcile with his brother Esau, from whom he fled after stealing the birthright and blessing (Gen 27). Before meeting Esau, Jacob sends messengers ahead, only to receive news that Esau is coming to meet him with four hundred men. This large retinue suggested to Jacob either overwhelming generosity or, more likely given his history with Esau, hostile intent. Jacob is greatly distressed and fearful (Gen 32:7), recognizing the grave danger he faces. Verse 8 describes his immediate, tactical response to this news, driven by fear for his large household and immense wealth accumulated during his time with Laban. This human strategy precedes, but also sets the stage for, Jacob's desperate prayer to God (Gen 32:9-12) and his eventual wrestling match at Peniel (Gen 32:22-32).

Genesis 32 8 Word analysis

• Then he divided: This phrase translates the Hebrew vayyachats (וַיְחַץ), derived from the root חָצַץ (chatsats), meaning "to divide," "to cut in two," or "to separate." The "then" signifies an immediate, decisive action taken directly in response to the alarming news about Esau. It conveys the speed and intensity of Jacob's strategic thinking.
• the people who were with him: Refers to Jacob's numerous household: his wives (Leah, Rachel, Bilhah, Zilpah), his eleven sons (Benjamin not yet born), daughters, servants, and laborers. This emphasizes that not just his possessions, but his entire extended family and dependent community, were at risk and were part of this strategic division.
• and the flocks and herds and the camels: These represent Jacob's vast wealth, accumulated over two decades with Laban. They were vital for sustenance, prestige, and future prosperity in a nomadic pastoral society. Their inclusion in the division underscores the comprehensiveness of Jacob's protective measures, aiming to save his assets along with his family. The camel was a valuable animal for transport and wealth, especially in the ancient Near East.
• into two camps: shney machanot (שְׁנֵי מַחֲנוֹת). Machaneh (מַחֲנֶה) means a camp, encampment, or army camp. The number "two" indicates a deliberate splitting for strategic advantage. This mirrors a military tactic, where forces are divided to avoid total destruction by a superior enemy, allowing at least a portion to survive or regroup.

Words-group by words-group analysis:

• "Then he divided... into two camps": This phrase captures Jacob's tactical response. It shows a man thinking strategically under pressure, prioritizing survival and mitigating potential loss. This pragmatic division contrasts with the simple, undifferentiated movement of nomadic camps, highlighting the gravity of the perceived threat.
• "the people who were with him and the flocks and herds and the camels": This comprehensive listing shows that Jacob took everything valuable to him—his family (human capital) and his possessions (economic capital)—and subjected them to this risk-management strategy. This demonstrates the extent of his concern and foresight in planning for disaster, suggesting he was not leaving anything to chance. The "two camps" was a plan for preservation of his lineage and legacy.

Genesis 32 8 Bonus section

Jacob's tactical division into "two camps" has often been interpreted beyond its literal military application. Some scholars see a foreshadowing of the future twelve tribes of Israel (derived from Jacob's sons), where the notion of distinct groupings is part of God's overarching plan for the nation. Furthermore, Jacob's careful preparation and fear, despite prior divine encounters (Gen 28:10-22 at Bethel, and Gen 32:1-2 with the angels of God), illuminate the real struggles of faith. It shows that faith is not the absence of fear, but rather acting in belief despite it, or turning to God from it. The journey from this fearful division to his desperate prayer and subsequent wrestling match (Gen 32:24-32) paints a vivid picture of the maturation of faith—where human resourcefulness ultimately yields to divine encounter and dependence. This struggle resonates with believers who often seek to manage their circumstances independently before fully surrendering to God's providence.

Genesis 32 8 Commentary

Genesis 32:8 reveals Jacob as a complex figure, grappling with deep-seated fear even after receiving divine promises. His decision to divide his company into two camps is a testament to his shrewd, pragmatic nature, a trait evident throughout his life. This act demonstrates a man who plans meticulously for survival, showing human ingenuity in the face of perceived danger. Yet, it also highlights his momentary reliance on human strategy rather than a complete surrender to God's promised protection (Gen 31:3).

While this tactical maneuver appears wise from a worldly perspective—minimizing losses in a worst-case scenario—it implicitly conveys Jacob's immediate lack of perfect trust in the Lord at this specific point. His fear for his family and possessions eclipses, if only temporarily, the memory of God's command to return and His prior covenant promises of protection and blessing. This tension between human planning and divine dependence is a recurring theme in the Bible. Ultimately, this self-devised plan precedes, and perhaps precipitates, Jacob's desperate and transforming encounter with God at Peniel, where he learns to lean more fully on the divine strength. Jacob’s actions here serve as a reminder that even faithful individuals can falter in fear, and resort to human wisdom, before turning back to God.