Genesis 25 30

Genesis 25:30 kjv

And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.

Genesis 25:30 nkjv

And Esau said to Jacob, "Please feed me with that same red stew, for I am weary." Therefore his name was called Edom.

Genesis 25:30 niv

He said to Jacob, "Quick, let me have some of that red stew! I'm famished!" (That is why he was also called Edom.)

Genesis 25:30 esv

And Esau said to Jacob, "Let me eat some of that red stew, for I am exhausted!" (Therefore his name was called Edom. )

Genesis 25:30 nlt

Esau said to Jacob, "I'm starved! Give me some of that red stew!" (This is how Esau got his other name, Edom, which means "red.")

Genesis 25 30 Cross References

VerseTextReference
Gen 25:23And the LORD said to her, "Two nations are in your womb..."Prophecy of two opposing nations (Israel/Edom).
Gen 25:34...Esau ate and drank and rose and went his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright.Explicit statement of Esau's despising.
Gen 27:36And Esau said, "Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has cheated me these two times... my blessing!"Esau's bitter lament over lost birthright/blessing.
Gen 48:5-6Jacob adopting Joseph's sons Ephraim and Manasseh for inheritance.Illustrates value of birthright's inheritance.
Num 20:14-21Edom refuses Israel passage, showing long-standing animosity.Consequence of the nation's disposition.
Deut 21:17...he shall acknowledge the son of the unloved as the firstborn... to give him a double portion...Law establishing the firstborn's rights.
Judg 11:24...whoever Chemosh your god gives you to possess...Birthright signifies inheriting the land.
1 Sam 1:5...gave to Hannah a double portion, because he loved her.Symbolic "double portion" often associated with firstborn or favor.
Mal 1:2-3"Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated..."God's sovereign choice regarding the nations.
Obad 1:1-21Prophecy against Edom for pride and violence against Jacob/Israel.Historical hostility stemming from foundational character.
Amos 1:11...for three transgressions of Edom, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment, because he pursued his brother...Edom's enduring cruelty against Israel.
Heb 12:16-17See to it that no one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his birthright.Explicitly labels Esau as "godless/profane" and connects it to the sale.
Phil 3:18-19For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, walk as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their end is destruction, their god is their stomach...Warning against those whose primary concern is physical appetite.
Lk 4:3-4The devil said to him, "If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become bread." Jesus answered, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone...'"Prioritizing spiritual sustenance over physical necessity.
Matt 6:33But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness...Emphasis on seeking spiritual priorities over earthly concerns.
Prov 23:2If you are a man given to appetite, put a knife to your throat.Wisdom warning against uncontrolled appetite.
1 Cor 9:27But I discipline my body and keep it under control...Self-discipline over physical desires.
Rom 9:10-13...though they were not yet born and had done nothing... that God's purpose of election might continue...God's sovereign choice, irrespective of human deeds or birth order.
Gen 3:6...she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband...Immediate gratification leading to grave consequences.
Jas 1:15Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin...The destructive path from desire to sin.

Genesis 25 verses

Genesis 25 30 Meaning

Genesis 25:30 records Esau's desperate plea to Jacob to consume a simple meal, specifying its color and stating his extreme exhaustion. This exchange culminates in a pivotal act where Esau, driven by immediate physical hunger, dismisses the immense value of his birthright for a bowl of "red stuff." The verse then highlights the lasting consequence of this choice by stating that Esau's nickname, "Edom" (meaning "red"), was directly linked to this event, forever marking his identity through his profound disregard for his spiritual inheritance.

Genesis 25 30 Context

Genesis 25 marks a crucial turning point in the Abrahamic narrative, shifting focus from Abraham's life and death to the generational unfolding of his covenant promises through his son Isaac and his twin sons, Jacob and Esau. The preceding verses introduce Rebekah's difficult pregnancy and God's prophecy that "two nations are in your womb," and "the older shall serve the younger" (Gen 25:23), setting the stage for the dramatic inversion of traditional birth order. Esau is described as a skillful hunter, a man of the field, symbolizing his immediate gratification and earthly pursuits. Jacob, conversely, is described as a "quiet man, dwelling in tents," implying a more reflective, perhaps strategic, and domestic nature. This verse directly follows these descriptions, immediately illustrating the contrasting characters of the brothers and the significance of the firstborn birthright, which granted double inheritance, headship of the family, and primary status within the covenantal promises passed down from Abraham and Isaac. The event is deeply etched into the future identity of Esau's descendants, the Edomites.

Genesis 25 30 Word analysis

  • And Esau said: Introduces the immediate and impatient voice of Esau, signaling his demand.
  • to Jacob, 'Please let me gulp down...': (Hebrew: הַלְעִיטֵנִי, hal‘îṭênî). Derived from the root לָעַט (la‘aṭ), meaning "to feed ravenously, to swallow quickly, to devour." This is not a polite request for food, but an urgent, almost animalistic demand to satisfy an overwhelming immediate need. It highlights Esau's impulsiveness and lack of self-control, suggesting a rapid, greedy ingestion, contrasting with thoughtful consumption.
  • 'some of that red stuff, for I am famished.': (Hebrew: מִן הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה, min hā’ādōm hā’ādōm hazzēh). The repetition of ’ādōm ("red") emphasizes the striking color of the stew (likely lentils, mentioned in Gen 25:34) and foreshadows the new name ’Edom. The repetition indicates not just redness but perhaps an intense, overwhelming red, signifying its compelling appeal to Esau.
  • 'for I am famished': (Hebrew: כִּי עָיֵף אָנֹכִי, kî ‘āyêf ’ānōḵî). The word ‘āyêf means "weary, faint, exhausted," going beyond mere hunger. It depicts a state of utter physical depletion, providing Esau's justification (or rationalization) for his rash decision. His physical exhaustion dictates his immediate priorities, overriding any consideration for future blessing or status.
  • Therefore his name was called Edom.: (Hebrew: עַל כֵּן קָרָא שְׁמוֹ אֱדוֹם, ‘al kēn qārā’ šəmô ’ĕḏôm). This serves as an etiological statement, providing the origin of Esau's alternate name and the name of his descendants' nation, Edom. The name ’Edom means "red," a permanent label rooted in his despising his birthright for a temporary, physical indulgence. It marks a foundational identity for Esau and the nation that would later stand in opposition to Israel.
  • Words-group Analysis:
    • "Please let me gulp down some of that red stuff": This phrase encapsulates Esau's core character flaws: impulsiveness, lack of foresight, and valuing immediate physical gratification over significant long-term spiritual blessings. The urgency and animalistic craving (gulp down) are starkly evident.
    • "for I am famished. Therefore his name was called Edom": This highlights the immediate consequence and permanent historical marker of Esau's profound short-sightedness. His exhaustion becomes the pretext for a choice that permanently defines him and his lineage by a common, easily-obtainable meal, rather than his birthright privilege.

Genesis 25 30 Bonus section

  • The naming of Edom (red) from the "red stuff" serves as a narrative etiology not only for Esau's nickname but also for the subsequent nation of Edom. This etymological pun ties the entire national character and destiny of the Edomites to this single act of their progenitor's profound shortsightedness and disdain for spiritual things.
  • The event signifies a narrative justification for why the Abrahamic blessing, particularly the lineage through whom the Messiah would come, passed to Jacob rather than Esau, the natural firstborn. It illustrates divine election operating through human choices and consequences.
  • Esau's state of being 'ayeph (famished/weary) implies a lack of rational thought, but his subsequent action is presented not as a moment of weakness to be pitied, but as a defining act of his true character, as confirmed by later biblical writers (Heb 12:16).
  • The story suggests that decisions made under extreme pressure or bodily urgency can still have lasting spiritual and covenantal implications. It underlines the principle that self-control and discernment are vital in valuing and preserving spiritual blessings.

Genesis 25 30 Commentary

Genesis 25:30 stands as a foundational narrative illuminating the profound consequences of valuing immediate carnal satisfaction over eternal spiritual blessing. Esau, weary and hungry from hunting, gives in to a desperate, unthinking craving for a mere bowl of lentil stew. His use of "gulp down" (la‘aṭ) indicates an uncontrolled, almost savage appetite, underscoring his profane disposition. The repetitive "red stuff" highlights the very mundane, physical object for which he forfeited a priceless heritage, and explicitly connects to his new, permanent identifier, "Edom." This verse encapsulates the profound difference between the brothers' character: Jacob, though cunning, valued the spiritual inheritance, while Esau dismissed it as worthless when compared to his temporary physical comfort. This act demonstrates that spiritual assets, when scorned, can be irreversibly lost, setting a critical precedent for understanding God's sovereign choices in redemption history. This incident serves as a stark warning to all who might trade their divine calling or heavenly inheritance for fleeting earthly desires or physical gratifications, establishing a paradigm of despising the sacred.