Deuteronomy 25:2 kjv
And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault, by a certain number.
Deuteronomy 25:2 nkjv
then it shall be, if the wicked man deserves to be beaten, that the judge will cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence, according to his guilt, with a certain number of blows.
Deuteronomy 25:2 niv
If the guilty person deserves to be beaten, the judge shall make them lie down and have them flogged in his presence with the number of lashes the crime deserves,
Deuteronomy 25:2 esv
then if the guilty man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence with a number of stripes in proportion to his offense.
Deuteronomy 25:2 nlt
If the person in the wrong is sentenced to be flogged, the judge must command him to lie down and be beaten in his presence with the number of lashes appropriate to the crime.
Deuteronomy 25 2 Cross References
Verse | Text | Reference |
---|---|---|
Deut 25:3 | Forty stripes he may give him, and not exceed; lest, if he should exceed... your brother seem vile to you. | Explicitly states the maximum limit of 40 lashes to prevent excessive degradation. |
Exod 21:23-25 | ...life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. | Principle of proportional justice (Lex Talionis), where punishment fits the offense. |
Lev 24:19-20 | If anyone injures his neighbor, as he has done, so it shall be done to him... as he has disfigured a person, he shall be disfigured. | Reiteration of proportional justice in matters of injury. |
Prov 24:23-25 | These also are sayings of the wise: Partiality in judging is not good. Whoever says to the wicked, "You are righteous," will be cursed by peoples… | Emphasizes the judge's duty to justly condemn the wicked, not acquit them. |
Prov 13:24 | Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him. | While parental, indicates the principle of necessary discipline. |
Prov 19:18 | Discipline your son, for there is hope; do not set your heart on putting him to death. | Highlights discipline as a means to hope, not destruction. |
Prov 29:26 | Many seek the favor of a ruler, but it is from the LORD that a man gets justice. | Justice ultimately stems from God, executed through His appointed authorities. |
Isa 1:17 | Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow's cause. | A divine call for the practice of impartial and active justice. |
Amos 5:24 | But let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream. | A prophetic plea for widespread and consistent justice in society. |
Mic 6:8 | He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? | Summarizes God's requirement for righteous living, including doing justice. |
Deut 1:16-17 | I charged your judges at that time, 'Hear cases between your brothers, and judge righteously between a man and his brother or the alien... | Instructions for judges to judge justly and without partiality. |
Deut 16:18 | You shall appoint judges and officers in all your towns that the LORD your God is giving you… and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment. | Establishes the importance of a functioning and righteous judicial system. |
Deut 17:8-13 | If any case arises requiring a decision between one kind of homicide or another, one kind of legal right or another, or one kind of assault or another… | Details the judicial appeals process, demonstrating an ordered legal system. |
2 Cor 11:24 | Five times I received at the hands of the Jews the forty lashes less one. | Illustrates the traditional Jewish practice of administering 39 lashes, respecting the limit. |
Matt 10:17 | Beware of men, for they will deliver you over to courts and flog you in their synagogues... | Indicates flogging as a known judicial punishment in Jesus' time. |
Matt 27:26 | Then he released for them Barabbas, and having flogged Jesus, delivered him to be crucified. | Mentions Jesus enduring flogging as part of His suffering. |
Acts 16:37 | But Paul said to them, “They have beaten us publicly, uncondemned Roman citizens, and thrown us into prison…” | Paul appeals to due process, indicating that flogging required proper legal authorization. |
Psa 82:3-4 | Give justice to the weak and the orphan; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy... | Divine command for judges to act on behalf of the vulnerable and uphold righteousness. |
Rom 13:3-4 | For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the authority? Then do what is good... for he is God's servant for your good. | Acknowledges the legitimate role of governing authorities in punishing wrongdoers. |
1 Tim 5:20 | As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear. | Public admonition/punishment serving as a deterrent. |
Gal 6:7 | Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. | General principle of consequences for actions, aligning with proportionate punishment. |
Job 30:10 | They abhor me; they stand aloof from me; they do not refrain from spitting at my face. | Describes a level of public contempt and humiliation, often part of such punishments. |
Deuteronomy 25 verses
Deuteronomy 25 2 Meaning
Deuteronomy 25:2 prescribes a specific judicial procedure for administering corporal punishment in ancient Israel. It mandates that when an individual is legally found guilty of an offense that warrants flogging, the presiding judge is personally responsible for overseeing the punishment. The condemned person is to be made to lie down, and the flogging is to be administered directly in the judge's presence. Crucially, the number of lashes given must be carefully calculated to be precisely proportionate to the severity of the crime committed. This statute underscores a highly controlled and dignified application of justice, ensuring neither arbitrary abuse nor excessive cruelty, but a balanced adherence to the law's requirement for accountability while preserving, as much as possible, the condemned's basic human dignity within the community.
Deuteronomy 25 2 Context
Deuteronomy 25 is situated within the "Deuteronomic Code," Moses's extensive second address to the Israelites, delivered just before they enter Canaan. This section (Deut 21-25) compiles various civil and ceremonial laws, designed to establish and maintain a righteous and holy community under God's covenant. Chapter 25 specifically covers diverse legal matters, ranging from the limit of lashes, to the levirate marriage, unequal weights, and the command to utterly blot out Amalek. Verse 2 falls under the regulation of judicial procedures, emphasizing the necessity of a just and ordered society. It precedes the crucial injunction in verse 3, which sets an absolute limit on the number of lashes, illustrating a system concerned with both justice and the preservation of human dignity, even for criminals. This commitment to controlled and proportionate punishment distinguished Israelite law from many arbitrary or excessively cruel practices prevalent in the Ancient Near East, underscoring the divine ideal of righteous judgment.
Deuteronomy 25 2 Word analysis
- if the guilty person (וּמַלְקֹות, u'malkot): While literally meaning "and if stripes/blows," this phrase idiomatically introduces the scenario where a person is judicially determined to have committed an offense worthy of physical chastisement. The implied
רָשָׁע
(rasha - guilty/wicked one) from the preceding context reinforces the person's proven culpability. - deserves to be beaten (בֶּן הַכֹּות, ben hakkot): This precise Hebrew idiom, "son of blows," confirms a formal legal judgment. It is not a matter of subjective opinion but a legal prescription; the specific crime committed demands this particular corporal punishment.
- the judge (הַשֹׁפֵט, hashofet): Refers to the legitimate, divinely-appointed magistrate who holds legal authority. The focus on the judge highlights the judicial oversight crucial for just administration and sets the process apart from informal retaliation.
- is to make them lie down (וְהִפִּילֹו, v'hippilo): Literally, "he shall make him fall down." This denotes the physical positioning of the condemned, typically prostrate, to prepare for the flogging. This action is part of the formal procedure and symbolizes submission to the legal verdict and the authority of the court.
- and have them flogged (וְהִכָּהוּ, v'hikkahu): This direct verb means "he shall strike him/beat him." It is the instruction for the physical act of administering the lashes, carried out under direct command from the judge.
- in his presence (לְפָנָיו, l'fanav): This critical phrase means "before his face" or "under his direct observation." It dictates that the judge must be physically present and actively witness the entire flogging. This ensures strict adherence to the law's stipulations, preventing arbitrary severity, sadism, or exceeding the decreed number of lashes, thereby protecting the integrity of justice and preventing abuse.
- with the number of lashes (בְּמִסְפַּר מַכֹּות, b'mispar makkot): This emphasizes that the flogging is not to be arbitrary but involves a precise count of the blows. It points directly to the legal limitation that will be elaborated upon in the subsequent verse (Deut 25:3), highlighting that the punishment is controlled and predetermined.
- appropriate for their crime (כְּדֵי רִשְׁעָתוֹ, k'dei rish'ato): Literally "according to the measure of his wickedness/guilt." This core principle of proportionality demands that the punishment precisely matches the severity of the offense. It mandates a careful and just assessment by the judge to ensure that the punishment fits the crime, aligning the penalty with the transgression rather than an arbitrary or emotional reaction.
Words-group by words-group analysis
- "if the guilty person deserves to be beaten, the judge is to make them lie down": This initial clause underscores the systematic and legal nature of the punishment. It begins with a clear verdict of guilt leading to a specifically prescribed form of correction. The act of "lying down" is the formal preparatory step, emphasizing submission to judicial authority and setting the stage for the physical administration of justice.
- "and have them flogged in his presence": This central part highlights both the directness of the punishment and the crucial element of judicial oversight. The judge's personal presence prevents the flogging from devolving into unchecked brutality or a private act of vengeance, guaranteeing transparency, accountability, and adherence to legal limits throughout the administration of the punishment. It acts as a bulwark against cruel and unusual punishment.
- "with the number of lashes appropriate for their crime": This concluding phrase embodies the principle of proportionality, demanding that the punishment be meticulously calculated and directly correlated with the gravity of the transgression. It signifies a measured application of force, implicitly linking to the forthcoming explicit maximum of forty lashes. This requirement demonstrates a divine concern for justice that is neither excessive nor insufficient, aiming for correction and deterrence while preserving human dignity.
Deuteronomy 25 2 Bonus section
The command for the judge's personal oversight in Deuteronomy 25:2 signifies the solemnity of judicial punishment in Israel. It implies that the legal process, even in its most severe applications, was public, transparent, and bound by divine decree, contrasting sharply with arbitrary torture or secret, unchecked violence sometimes found in other ancient societies. This personal accountability placed upon the judge underscored the holiness and justice that God expected from His covenant people's judicial system. Furthermore, this verse lays the groundwork for the immediate follow-up in Deut 25:3, which specifies the absolute maximum of "forty stripes." This limit, which became famously interpreted as "forty less one" (39 lashes) in later Jewish tradition (to avoid inadvertently exceeding the limit by miscounting, as mentioned by Paul in 2 Cor 11:24), profoundly illustrates the precision and self-limitation inherent in God's law. It reflects a core value: while justice must be served, the offender's basic humanity, even in their convicted state, must not be utterly degraded, as this would violate the divine image in humanity and cause the "brother" to seem vile.
Deuteronomy 25 2 Commentary
Deuteronomy 25:2 is a profound testament to the LORD's righteous character and His demand for justice tempered with humanity, even in punitive actions. It firmly establishes corporal punishment within a strict legal framework, preventing the widespread abuse of power prevalent in many ancient cultures. The divine mandate that the judge "make them lie down and have them flogged in his presence" is revolutionary. It places the ultimate accountability for the justice system directly on the presiding legal authority, preventing anonymous brutality or uncontrolled infliction of pain. This requirement for direct judicial oversight safeguards against arbitrary excess, cruelty, and the dehumanization of the condemned, affirming that even a person facing severe judgment remains subject to God's ordained law and a degree of inherent dignity. The instruction to administer lashes "appropriate for their crime" is a foundational statement on proportionate justice. It ensures that punishment is not retributive rage but a calculated response, a key principle underlying the ethical framework of Israelite law and distinct from other codes where severity might be arbitrary or aimed solely at crushing the spirit. This verse ensures that the flogging, though painful and humiliating, serves its legal purpose—correction and deterrence—without violating fundamental limits. This principle translates to contemporary contexts, advocating for fair legal processes, transparent accountability in official actions, and disciplinary measures that are consistently just, proportional, and avoid degrading the inherent worth of individuals, even when holding them accountable for their transgressions.