Acts 26 30

Acts 26:30 kjv

And when he had thus spoken, the king rose up, and the governor, and Bernice, and they that sat with them:

Acts 26:30 nkjv

When he had said these things, the king stood up, as well as the governor and Bernice and those who sat with them;

Acts 26:30 niv

The king rose, and with him the governor and Bernice and those sitting with them.

Acts 26:30 esv

Then the king rose, and the governor and Bernice and those who were sitting with them.

Acts 26:30 nlt

Then the king, the governor, Bernice, and all the others stood and left.

Acts 26 verses

Acts 26 30 Meaning

Acts 26:30 records the immediate, physical reaction of King Agrippa II, Governor Festus, Bernice, and the accompanying dignitaries following Paul's defense. Upon the conclusion of Paul's fervent testimony and appeal, they all rose from their seats, signaling the official termination of the hearing. This act signifies the end of the formal proceedings rather than an endorsement or rejection of Paul's message.

Acts 26 30 Context

This verse marks the climax and the end of Paul's impassioned defense before King Agrippa II, Governor Festus, Bernice, and a crowd of dignitaries in Caesarea. Chapters 25 and 26 describe Paul's transfer from Jerusalem to Caesarea, his appeal to Caesar, and the formal hearing arranged by Festus for King Agrippa. Paul, having suffered wrongful accusations and imprisonment, seized this moment to present his powerful testimony, recounting his dramatic conversion on the Damascus road and his subsequent calling as an apostle to the Gentiles. He meticulously connected his ministry to the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, appealing directly to King Agrippa's Jewish heritage and knowledge of the prophets. The preceding verse (Acts 26:29) reveals Paul's fervent prayer that not only Agrippa but all present would become as he was—free in Christ, yet without the chains. Immediately following this spiritual plea, the key figures of authority rose, bringing the judicial proceeding to a close, a subtle indication of the profound impact or discomfort Paul's words may have had.

Acts 26 30 Word analysis

• Then: Greek Τούτων (Toutōn) - referring to "these things" Paul had spoken, connecting his concluding remarks directly to their action.
• the king: Greek ὁ βασιλεύς (ho basileus) - refers to King Agrippa II. This highlights his leadership among those present, and his position as the primary authority whose opinion mattered.
• rose: Greek ἀνέστη (anestē) - an aorist active indicative, indicating a decisive, completed action. It marks the termination of the formal hearing, not necessarily an emotional or spiritual assent. In Jewish cultural contexts, standing might signify agreement or a respectful conclusion to discourse, but here it appears administrative.
• and the governor: Greek ὅ τε ἡγεμών (ho te hēgemōn) - referring to Festus. His rising alongside Agrippa indicates a joint decision to conclude the session. Festus previously thought Paul was "out of his mind" (Acts 26:24).
• and Bernice: Paul's direct and persuasive message, especially regarding sin and salvation, likely resonated, or caused discomfort, given her own morally ambiguous relationship with Agrippa. Her rising reflects her position alongside the primary figures.
• and those who sat with them: This phrase (καὶ οἱ συνκαθήμενοι αὐτοῖς) refers to the large assembly of tribunes and leading men of the city (Acts 25:23). Their collective rising underscores the official end of the public address and the gravity of the audience. The entire court, from the highest authority to the gathered dignitaries, acknowledged the conclusion.

Words-group by words-group analysis:

• When he had said these things: This phrase marks the conclusion of Paul's extensive defense and prophetic appeal, highlighting that the ensuing actions are a direct response to his entire address, especially his concluding remarks in verses 27-29.
• the king rose, and the governor, and Bernice, and those who sat with them: This enumeration of specific individuals, followed by the general assembly, emphasizes the unanimity of the decision to conclude the proceedings. Their rising together signifies a formal closure rather than a dramatic emotional response. It also underscores that Paul's message had been fully heard by all the relevant authorities and the gathered elite, leading to a consensus that the formal listening was over. The order of naming respects their political and social hierarchy, with King Agrippa taking precedence.

Acts 26 30 Bonus section

The formal closure in Acts 26:30 is an intriguing contrast to Paul's hopes. His plea was not for a verdict of "not guilty," but for a verdict of "saved" for his audience (Acts 26:29). Yet, the human response documented is one of procedural completion. This moment in Acts serves as a microcosm of how the world often interacts with the Gospel: it listens, acknowledges the force of the argument, but then retreats to its own counsel and systems, often without committing fully. The authority figures rise not in praise or condemnation, but simply because the "show" is over, and it's time for them to process Paul's words through their own worldly lens. This scene underscores the sovereignty of the Holy Spirit to convert hearts, even when the most persuasive human orator has finished their address. Despite Paul's chains, his freedom in Christ stood in stark contrast to the spiritual captivity of these rulers who, though convinced intellectually, ultimately chose administrative pragmatism over spiritual transformation (as evidenced by their later decision in Acts 26:32 not to release him because of his appeal to Caesar).

Acts 26 30 Commentary

Acts 26:30 succinctly describes the physical act that brings Paul's hearing before Agrippa to its close. While seemingly simple, the rising of the royal and administrative party is highly significant. It confirms that Paul's lengthy and compelling defense has run its course and the formal proceedings are finished. Although the immediate prior verse reveals Agrippa's partial confession "You almost persuade me to be a Christian," and Paul's passionate wish for their full conversion, this verse shows no such overt positive outcome. Instead, it marks a transition point: the word has been spoken, and now the human decision-making process, both intellectual and spiritual, begins among the listeners in private council (Acts 26:31-32). Their rising suggests a general disquiet or a powerful impression left by Paul, prompting them to move beyond the public stage and deliberate privately on what they had heard. The formal ending to the hearing subtly suggests the world's formal reaction to the Gospel's challenge - heard, acknowledged, but often not immediately or fully embraced.Examples for practical usage:

1. Conclude a difficult conversation: When facing strong opposition or after a thorough explanation, sometimes a simple act of ending the discussion is necessary, allowing all parties to process.
2. Move from declaration to deliberation: A speaker's task is to present truth; the audience's task is to consider and decide. This verse illustrates that transition.
3. Witnessing's endpoint: There's a time for proclaiming the message, and a time to step back, pray, and let God's Spirit work in the hearts of the hearers.