Acts 26:27 kjv
King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest.
Acts 26:27 nkjv
King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know that you do believe."
Acts 26:27 niv
King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know you do."
Acts 26:27 esv
King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know that you believe."
Acts 26:27 nlt
King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know you do ? "
Acts 26 27 Cross References
| Verse | Text | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Acts 26:27 | If you, King Agrippa, believe the prophets, do you not believe their words? | Fulfillment of OT prophecy |
| John 5:46 | For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. | Moses foretold Christ |
| John 5:39 | You search the Scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me. | OT testifies about Christ |
| Romans 1:1-4 | concerning His Son, who was born of the tribe of Judah, according to the flesh, who was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord. | Resurrection as proof of Sonship |
| 1 Corinthians 15:14 | And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. | Resurrection essential for faith |
| 1 Corinthians 15:17 | And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. | Resurrection impacts sin and salvation |
| 1 Corinthians 15:4 | that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, | Scripture predicted resurrection |
| Luke 24:27 | and beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. | Jesus taught OT fulfilled in Him |
| Luke 24:44 | Then he said to them, "Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead," | Jesus directly links prophecy to resurrection |
| Acts 2:30-31 | Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn an oath to him that he would set him on his own ancestor David. | David's prophecy concerning Christ's reign and resurrection |
| Acts 2:32 | This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses. | Apostles as witnesses |
| Acts 17:3 | explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, "This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ." | Paul's pattern of teaching |
| Acts 26:22 | To this day I have had help from God, and so I stand here today testifying to both small and great, saying nothing but what the prophets and Moses said would come to pass: | Paul bases his testimony on prophecy |
| Matthew 27:52-53 | the tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many. | Resurrection of saints during Christ's resurrection |
| Acts 4:1-2 | And as Peter and John were speaking to the people, the priests and the captain of the temple guard and the Sadducees came upon them, greatly annoyed because they were teaching the people and proclaiming in Jesus the resurrection from the dead. | Early church's focus on resurrection |
| Romans 10:9 | because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. | Confession and belief in resurrection lead to salvation |
| 2 Timothy 2:8 | Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead, a descendant of David, according to my gospel, | Paul's gospel rooted in resurrection |
| Acts 13:32-33 | And we bring to you the good news that what God promised to the fathers, this he has fulfilled to us their children by raising Jesus, as also it is written in the second Psalm, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you.” | Psalm 2 interpreted as Christ's resurrection and divine sonship |
| 1 Peter 3:18 | For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, | Suffering and resurrection bringing us to God |
| 1 Peter 1:3 | Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, | Resurrection as source of living hope |
Acts 26 verses
Acts 26 27 Meaning
This verse encapsulates Paul's direct challenge to King Agrippa II. He questions the king's conviction, implying that Agrippa, having heard the testimony about Jesus and the resurrection, should believe. The rhetorical question is designed to expose the potential hypocrisy or inner conflict Agrippa might be experiencing, linking his knowledge of the prophetic scriptures to his disbelief.
Acts 26 27 Context
This verse is spoken by the Apostle Paul during his defense before King Agrippa II, Bernice, Festus, and other high-ranking officials in Caesarea Maritima (Acts 26:1-32). Paul recounts his conversion experience on the road to Damascus and his subsequent ministry, emphasizing that his message aligns with the Old Testament prophets and Moses. Agrippa, as a Jew, would have been intimately familiar with these scriptures. The context is Paul's final defense in a secular court, aiming to present the Gospel's consistency with Jewish scripture and thereby gain freedom or at least mitigate the accusations against him. He is appealing to Agrippa's knowledge of the Law and the Prophets to consider the veracity of the Christian message.
Acts 26 27 Word Analysis
- εἰ (ei): "if" - A conditional particle introducing a hypothetical statement. It denotes an unfulfilled condition from the speaker's perspective.
- δὲ (de): "but" or "and" - A conjunction indicating a contrast or a logical progression. Here, it links the previous statement about believing the prophets to the following question.
- βασιλεῦ (basileu): "O King" - Vocative case of "basileus," meaning king. Used here to directly address Agrippa.
- Ἀγρίππα (Agrippa): "Agrippa" - The proper name of King Agrippa II.
- πιστεύεις (pisteueis): "you believe" - Second person singular, present indicative active of "pisteuo," meaning to trust, believe, rely on. It implies an ongoing state or a present conviction.
- τοῖς (tois): "the" - Definite article, masculine plural, dative case. Modifies "prophetas."
- προφήταις (prophetas): "prophets" - Masculine plural, accusative case of "prophetes." Refers to the divinely inspired messengers of God in the Old Testament.
- εἰδὼς (eidos): "knowing" - Perfect active participle of "oida," meaning to know. It conveys a state of knowing, a deep understanding or awareness. It implies Agrippa’s inherent knowledge or intellectual assent.
- οἶδας (oidas): "you know" - Second person singular, perfect indicative active of "oida." Similar to "eidos," but here it is directly stated as Agrippa’s knowledge. It emphasizes Agrippa's awareness of this truth.
- ὅτι (hoti): "that" - A conjunction introducing an indirect statement or explanation. It links "you know" to the following clause about the prophets' testimony.
- καὶ (kai): "and" or "also" - A conjunction, here possibly emphasizing "also their words," reinforcing the comprehensive nature of the prophets' testimony.
Group of Words Analysis:
- "εἰ ... πιστεύεις τοῖς προφήταις" (ei pisteueis tois prophetas): This conditional clause establishes a premise: "if you believe the prophets." Paul assumes Agrippa accepts the authority of the Old Testament prophets.
- "εἰδὼς οἶδας ὅτι" (eidos oidas hoti): This phrase highlights Agrippa’s existing knowledge: "knowing, you know that." The repetition of forms of "oida" ("knowing" and "you know") emphasizes the certainty and directness of Agrippa's awareness, suggesting he possesses information that logically leads to belief in the prophetic predictions.
- "καὶ αὐτῶν" (kai auton): "and their" - This pronoun "their" refers back to "the prophets," emphasizing that their testimony, specifically their words, are the subject of Agrippa's implied belief.
- "τῶν λόγων" (ton logon): "the words" - Genitive plural of "logos," meaning word, saying, speech. Paul points to the actual pronouncements of the prophets.
- "ἄπιστος εἶ" (apistos ei): "you are an unbeliever" - "Apistos" means faithless, unbelieving, or a disbeliever. This is the strong rhetorical conclusion of the question. It directly labels Agrippa as a disbeliever, directly challenging his lack of faith in Christ, given his purported belief in the prophets. The "ei" ("if") implies Agrippa might be inconsistent.
Acts 26 27 Bonus Section
This verse represents a key moment in Paul's evangelistic strategy: bridging Jewish belief with Christian truth. He presents Jesus not as a new figure, but as the culmination of ancient promises. This method, focusing on prophecy, was central to Paul’s apologetic, as seen in his preaching at synagogues (e.g., Acts 13:16-43). Agrippa, known for his involvement with Jewish affairs and religious knowledge, was a prime target for this specific appeal. The effectiveness of Paul's argument lies in its self-referential nature: it uses the very foundation of Agrippa's belief system (the Law and the Prophets) to dismantle his unbelief. The intensity of Paul's plea stems from the knowledge that salvation is tied to believing in Jesus Christ. His willingness to state, "Are you also trying to make me a Christian?" (Acts 26:28), immediately following this question, reveals the profound personal stake and the ultimate goal of his bold address: genuine conversion.
Acts 26 27 Commentary
Paul's potent question to Agrippa is not merely a matter of intellectual agreement but a challenge to internalize and act upon knowledge. He skillfully employs the king’s own adherence to the prophetic Scriptures to expose the logical inconsistency of his position regarding Jesus. If Agrippa accepts that the Old Testament foretold the coming Messiah, and if he understands that the prophets’ writings were divine revelation (implied by "knowing you know that"), then it logically follows that he should accept that Jesus fulfills those prophecies. The resurrection, as Paul has just powerfully proclaimed, is the cornerstone event proving Jesus’ identity as foretold by the prophets. Paul isn't accusing Agrippa of being ignorant, but rather of being unwilling to bridge the gap between knowing and believing. The implication is that Agrippa's rejection of Jesus stems not from a lack of evidence from the scriptures he values, but from a personal resistance to its implications for his own life and worldview. Paul is leveraging Agrippa's acknowledged respect for Scripture to press him towards an existential choice of faith.