Acts 25:6 kjv
And when he had tarried among them more than ten days, he went down unto Caesarea; and the next day sitting on the judgment seat commanded Paul to be brought.
Acts 25:6 nkjv
And when he had remained among them more than ten days, he went down to Caesarea. And the next day, sitting on the judgment seat, he commanded Paul to be brought.
Acts 25:6 niv
After spending eight or ten days with them, Festus went down to Caesarea. The next day he convened the court and ordered that Paul be brought before him.
Acts 25:6 esv
After he stayed among them not more than eight or ten days, he went down to Caesarea. And the next day he took his seat on the tribunal and ordered Paul to be brought.
Acts 25:6 nlt
About eight or ten days later Festus returned to Caesarea, and on the following day he took his seat in court and ordered that Paul be brought in.
Acts 25 6 Cross References
| Verse | Text | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Acts 25:7 | And when he had come, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood about Paul, bringing many and serious charges against him, which they could not prove. | Focuses on the lack of proof. |
| Acts 21:28 | Crying out, “Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against our people and our law and this place. Moreover, he also brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place.” | Historical accusations against Paul. |
| Acts 24:5 | For we have found this man a plague, a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes. | Earlier accusation of sedition. |
| Acts 24:13 | They cannot establish to you the thing of which they now accuse me. | Similar situation with Festus. |
| 1 Corinthians 4:5 | Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the hearts. Then each one will receive his commendation from God. | Ultimate judgment rests with God. |
| 2 Timothy 4:16 | At my first defense no one came to stand by me, but all deserted me. May it not be counted against them. | Paul's experience with desertion. |
| 2 Timothy 4:17 | But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, so that through me the message might be fully proclaimed and all the Gentiles might hear. So I was rescued from the lion's mouth. | God's faithfulness despite accusers. |
| John 18:38 | Pilate said to him, “What is truth?” And when he had said this, he went again to the Jews and said to them, “I find no guilt in him.” | Roman governor finds no fault. |
| Luke 23:4, 14 | Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.”... And Pilate called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people, and said to them, “You brought me this man as one who incites the people to rebellion. And look, having examined him before you, I have found no guilt in him that merits death.” | Jesus' innocence declared. |
| Acts 25:11 | If then I am an offender or have committed anything worthy of death, I do not refuse to die. But if there is nothing to these charges which these men bring against me, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar!” | Paul's confidence in his innocence. |
| Romans 8:1 | There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. | Spiritual freedom from condemnation. |
| 1 Peter 2:19 | For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, someone endures Misalnya by suffering unjustly. | Endurance of unjust suffering. |
| Hebrews 11:36 | Others suffered mocking, and even scourging, besides chains and imprisonment. | Those who faced trials. |
| Acts 26:10 | And so I did as much as I could to oppose the name of Jesus of Nazareth. | Paul admits opposition to Christ. |
| Acts 26:32 | But Agrippa said to Paul, “You may be permitted to speak for yourself.” Then Paul stretched out his hand and made his defense: | Paul gets an opportunity to speak. |
| Matthew 5:11 | “Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.” | Blessedness in persecution. |
| John 8:47 | Whoever is of God hears the words of God. The reason you do not hear them is that you are not of God.” | Those from God hear His words. |
| Acts 19:40 | For we are in danger of being accused of sedition today, since there is no justification for us on account of the riot yesterday.” | Fear of false accusation. |
| 2 Corinthians 11:32 | In Damascus the governor under King Aretas guarded the city of Damascus in order to seize me, | Specific instance of persecution. |
| Philippians 1:28 | And not frightened in anything by your opponents. This is a sign to them of destruction, but of salvation to you—and that from God. | Courage against opponents. |
Acts 25 verses
Acts 25 6 Meaning
The verse describes the accusers bringing charges against Paul before Felix the Roman governor. They were unable to prove the accusations, which means the charges were not substantiated.
Acts 25 6 Context
This verse occurs in Jerusalem where Paul had been arrested and brought to Caesarea Maritima. The Jewish leaders from Jerusalem had come to Caesarea specifically to press charges against Paul before Felix, the Roman governor. They presented their case, but, as Acts 25:7 states (and this verse echoes), they were unable to provide proof for their accusations. This sets the stage for Paul’s subsequent defense and his appeal to Caesar. The legal process described here highlights the conflict between Jewish authorities and early Christianity, as well as the Roman jurisdiction in these matters.
Acts 25 6 Word Analysis
- “οἱ” (hoi): Plural definite article, meaning "the." Refers to the Jews mentioned in the preceding verse.
- “Ἰουδαῖοί” (Ioudaioi): Jews. Refers to specific Jewish leaders or accusers from Jerusalem.
- “καταβάντες” (katabantes): Aorist participle from κατάβαινω (katabainō), meaning "having come down." Implies they descended from Jerusalem to Caesarea.
- “ἀπὸ” (apo): Preposition, "from." Denotes the place of origin.
- “Ἱερουσαλὴμ” (Hierousalēm): Jerusalem. The city from which the accusers came.
- “πάρεkęντο” (parekento): Pluperfect indicative, 3rd person plural of πάρειμι (pareimi), meaning "were present" or "stood around." Indicates their positioning around Paul.
- “καὶ” (kai): Conjunction, "and." Connects phrases.
- “αὐτῷ” (autō): Dative pronoun, "to him" or "for him." Refers to Paul.
- “βαστάζοντες” (bastazontes): Present participle from βαστάζω (bastazō), meaning "carrying" or "bearing." Here, it refers to bringing charges.
- “ἀνførtous” (anphreous): Accusative plural masculine of ἄνφqueros (anphmeros), meaning "charges," "accusations," or "complaints." The specific accusations against Paul are listed elsewhere (e.g., Acts 21:28; 24:5-6).
- “πολλὰς” (pollas): Accusative plural feminine of πολύς (polys), meaning "many." Indicates a multiplicity of charges.
- “καὶ” (kai): Conjunction, "and."
- “βαρείας” (bareias): Accusative plural feminine of βαρύς (barus), meaning "heavy," "serious," or "weighty." Suggests the gravity of the charges in the eyes of the accusers.
- “αἵ” (hai): Nominative plural feminine relative pronoun, "which." Introduces a relative clause referring to the charges.
- “οὐκ” (ouk): Negation, "not."
- “ἴσχυον” (ischyousan): Imperfect indicative, 3rd person plural of ἴσχυω (ischyuō), meaning "to be strong," "to be able," or "to prevail." The charges lacked the necessary strength or evidence to be proven.
- “ἔχειν” (echein): Infinitive, "to have." The charges did not possess the capability of being substantiated.
Group Analysis:
The phrase "bringing many and serious charges" (βαστάζοντες ἀνførtous πολλὰς καὶ βαρείας - bastazontes anphreous pollās kai bareias) emphasizes the determined effort of the accusers to present a formidable case against Paul, but the subsequent clause "which they could not prove" (αἵ οὐκ ἴσχυον ἔχειν - hai ouk ischyousan echein) reveals the fundamental weakness of their prosecution. The imperfect tense of ἴσχυον (ischyuousan) suggests that this inability to prove was an ongoing condition during the proceedings.
Acts 25 6 Bonus Section
The use of the imperfect tense for "could not prove" (οὐκ ἴσχυον - ouk ischyousan) is significant. It does not simply state a past inability but implies a continuous state of powerlessness during their attempt to prove the charges. This suggests a systemic failure to provide evidence, rather than a single missed opportunity. The Roman legal system, though imperfect, did require proof. The accusers' failure to meet this burden exposed the malicious intent behind their actions, highlighting the stark contrast between false accusation and factual evidence. This inability to prove was not due to lack of effort on their part but due to the absence of any true grounds for their accusations.
Acts 25 6 Commentary
The Jewish accusers came to present their case against Paul before Governor Felix. Despite bringing numerous and serious allegations, they were unable to substantiate them. This indicates a failure in their legal presentation, either due to a lack of valid evidence or due to the inherent weakness of their accusations. Their inability to prove their points exposed the weakness of their position and the likely falsity of their claims. It foreshadows Felix’s inability to find any guilt in Paul, leading to further legal developments. This scenario underscores the often baseless nature of persecution and the importance of truth and evidence in legal proceedings, even when driven by malice.