Acts 25 2

Acts 25:2 kjv

Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews informed him against Paul, and besought him,

Acts 25:2 nkjv

Then the high priest and the chief men of the Jews informed him against Paul; and they petitioned him,

Acts 25:2 niv

where the chief priests and the Jewish leaders appeared before him and presented the charges against Paul.

Acts 25:2 esv

And the chief priests and the principal men of the Jews laid out their case against Paul, and they urged him,

Acts 25:2 nlt

where the leading priests and other Jewish leaders met with him and made their accusations against Paul.

Acts 25 2 Cross References

VerseTextReference (Short Note)
Acts 25:3...asking that Festus send him to Jerusalem. They were preparing an ambush...Jewish leaders' lethal intent
Acts 24:1-9...Ananias the high priest came down with some elders and an orator...laid before him their case against Paul.Earlier formal accusation
Acts 23:12-14...more than forty Jews made a plot and bound themselves by an oath neither to eat nor drink...kill Paul.Prior assassination plot
Acts 20:3...as he was about to set sail for Syria, a plot was made against him by the Jews.Ongoing plots against Paul
Acts 21:27-31...Jews from Asia...stirred up all the crowd and laid hands on him, crying out...Kill him!Mob violence against Paul
Acts 14:19But Jews came from Antioch and Iconium, and having persuaded the crowds, they stoned Paul...Physical persecution of Paul
Acts 13:45But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began to contradict...Paul...Jewish opposition to gospel
Acts 9:23-25...Jews plotted together to kill him.Earliest plot against Paul
Matt 26:59-60Now the chief priests and the whole Council were seeking false testimony against Jesus...Similar tactics against Jesus
Matt 27:1-2...all the chief priests and the elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death.Jewish leaders' decision to kill Jesus
Jn 19:6-7When the chief priests and the officers saw him, they cried out, "Crucify him, crucify him!"Persistent demands for crucifixion
Acts 4:1-3...the priests and the captain of the temple and the Sadducees came upon them...arrested them...Arrest of early apostles
Acts 5:17-18...the high priest rose up, and all who were with him...filled with jealousy. They arrested the apostles...Jealousy leading to arrest
Acts 6:11-14Then they secretly instigated men who said, "We have heard him speak blasphemous words...False witnesses against Stephen
Acts 7:54...when they heard these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him.Fury against Stephen's message
Acts 18:12-13But when Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews made a united attack on Paul and brought him before the tribunal.Organized legal attacks
Ps 35:11Malicious witnesses rise up; they ask me of things that I do not know.Plea against false witnesses
1 Pet 2:19-23For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly...Enduring unjust suffering
Rom 8:31What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?God's protection of His own
Acts 18:9-10...the Lord said to Paul...Do not be afraid, but go on speaking...for I am with you...God's command and presence
Acts 23:11The following night the Lord stood by him and said, "Take courage, for as you have testified...so you must testify at Rome."God's purpose for Paul
Jer 1:19They will fight against you, but they shall not prevail against you...for I am with you, declares the Lord, to deliver you.God's promise of deliverance

Acts 25 verses

Acts 25 2 Meaning

This verse describes the immediate, official, and earnest action taken by the Jewish chief priests and prominent leaders. Upon the arrival of the new Roman governor, Festus, they swiftly presented formal charges against Paul, urging the governor to address their case. Their persistent accusation signaled their continued animosity and intent to see Paul condemned or otherwise removed.

Acts 25 2 Context

Acts chapter 25 opens with Festus arriving in Caesarea as the new Roman governor of Judea, replacing Felix. After only three days, he went up to Jerusalem. Verse 2 recounts that upon his arrival in the Jewish capital, the chief priests and other principal Jewish leaders quickly renewed their accusations against Paul, who had been imprisoned in Caesarea for two years under Felix. This was a crucial political move for the Jewish leadership, seeking to establish their influence with the new governor from the outset. Their action in this verse sets the stage for a critical phase of Paul's trials, leading to his appeal to Caesar. The underlying historical context involves the precarious relationship between Roman authority and Jewish local rule, with governors often needing to balance Roman law with the influential Jewish religious and political factions.

Acts 25 2 Word analysis

  • And (Καί - kai): This conjunction indicates continuity, showing that the animosity and pursuit of Paul did not end with the change of governors, but resumed immediately. It bridges the narrative from Festus's arrival to the actions of the Jewish leaders.
  • the chief priests (οἱ ἀρχιερεῖς - hoi archiereis): Refers to the powerful and influential heads of the priestly families, predominantly Sadducees, who formed the upper echelons of the Sanhedrin. They held significant religious and political sway, often appointed or confirmed by the Roman authorities. They were the primary antagonists of Jesus and the early Church, consistent in their opposition to Paul's gospel.
  • and the principal men of the Jews (καὶ οἱ πρῶτοι τῶν Ἰουδαίων - kai hoi prōtoi tōn Ioudaion): This phrase denotes other leading figures among the Jewish people, including elders, scribes, or influential citizens, beyond the priestly class. Their inclusion emphasizes that the opposition to Paul was not confined to a single faction but was a widespread and officially sanctioned effort by the Jewish establishment.
  • laid information against him (ἐνεφάνισαν κατ’ αὐτοῦ - enephanisan kat' autou): This is a legalistic term meaning "to lay a charge before," "to accuse formally," or "to present a formal case." It signifies a structured, official complaint or prosecution rather than casual gossip or informal complaint. It indicates that the previous accusations under Felix were being re-submitted or reinforced to the new governor.
  • before him (παρ' αὐτῷ - par' autō): Refers specifically to Festus, the new Roman governor. This highlights the formal, judicial setting and their direct appeal to the highest authority in the province, indicating a strategic attempt to gain his favor and action.
  • and begged him (καὶ παρεκάλουν αὐτόν - kai parekaloun auton): Translates to "earnestly requested," "implored," or "strongly urged." This demonstrates the intense desire, persistence, and perhaps even desperation of the Jewish leaders. It wasn't a casual request, but a fervent plea, foreshadowing the specific, insidious request in the next verse (Acts 25:3).

Words-group analysis:

  • "the chief priests and the principal men of the Jews": This group represents the collective official power and influence of the Jewish hierarchy. Their united front underscores the organized, authoritative, and formidable nature of the opposition Paul faced, demonstrating a broad institutional rejection of his ministry and message within Judaism.
  • "laid information against him before him, and begged him": This phrase describes a calculated and urgent legal and political maneuver. It indicates their readiness to leverage the change in governorship to their advantage, pushing their agenda immediately and with fervent persistence against Paul, desiring not just conviction but ultimately his removal, possibly by death.

Acts 25 2 Bonus section

  • Significance of Timing: The Jewish leaders' swift action within days of Festus's arrival in Jerusalem shows political shrewdness. They aimed to immediately influence the new governor's opinion and agenda, especially concerning a lingering contentious issue like Paul's imprisonment, to demonstrate their importance and gain initial favor.
  • Polemics against Beliefs: The verse reflects a polemic against the emerging Christian faith by the established Jewish religious authorities. From their perspective, Paul represented a grave threat to their traditions, interpretations of the Law, and political standing, which they saw as intertwined with Roman rule. His message of a crucified and resurrected Messiah was seen as blasphemous and disruptive.
  • Echoes of Jesus' Trial: The coordinated efforts of "chief priests and principal men" in laying charges and making urgent requests before a Roman governor strongly echo the sequence of events leading to Jesus' own trial and crucifixion, highlighting a recurring pattern of religious establishment opposing God's unfolding work.

Acts 25 2 Commentary

Acts 25:2 paints a vivid picture of the relentless and deeply rooted hostility that the Jewish leadership harbored against Paul. Even after two years of his imprisonment and the departure of Governor Felix, their animosity remained undimmed. The prompt, formal accusations laid before the freshly arrived Festus demonstrate their strategic political acumen and unyielding determination to achieve Paul's condemnation. Their "begging" was not an act of mere formality, but a passionate plea aimed at persuading Festus to act in their favor, implicitly hinting at the lethal agenda that is soon revealed (Acts 25:3). This event serves as a stark reminder of the cost of discipleship and the unwavering opposition faced by early Christians, yet also underscores God's sovereign plan to protect Paul and use these very antagonisms to advance His purpose of bringing the Gospel to Rome.