Acts 17 33

Acts 17:33 kjv

So Paul departed from among them.

Acts 17:33 nkjv

So Paul departed from among them.

Acts 17:33 niv

At that, Paul left the Council.

Acts 17:33 esv

So Paul went out from their midst.

Acts 17:33 nlt

That ended Paul's discussion with them,

Acts 17 33 Cross References

VerseTextReference
Responses to the Gospel/Preaching
Mt 10:14And whoever will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off...Rejection leads to departure
Lk 10:16The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me.Rejection of messenger is rejection of message
Jn 12:48The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge...Rejection of words has consequences
Acts 13:46It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to you...Turning away from the word
Acts 18:6When they opposed and reviled him, he shook out his garments and said...Resistance to Paul's message
Heb 4:2For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard...Failure to mix with faith
1 Cor 1:18For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing...Gospel is foolishness to unbelievers
1 Cor 2:14The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God...Spiritual truths are folly to natural mind
The Resurrection as a Stumbling Block
Acts 23:8For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection...The Sadducees deny resurrection
1 Cor 15:12-19Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some...If no resurrection, faith is futile
Mk 8:31And he began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things...Necessity of resurrection for Messiah
Lk 24:11But these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe.Resurrection seemed unbelievable
Division and Mixed Responses
Acts 14:4But the population of the city was divided; some sided with the Jews...Division among hearers of the Word
Jn 9:16Some of the Pharisees said, "This man is not from God, for he..."Mixed reactions to Jesus
Lk 12:51Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you...Gospel brings division
Paul's Persistence Despite Opposition
Acts 17:34But some men joined him and believed, among whom also was Dionysius...Immediate contrasting response of belief
2 Cor 4:8-9We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not...Paul's resilience despite opposition
2 Tim 4:2Preach the word; be ready in season and out of season...Continue preaching despite reception
Phil 1:18What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth...Preaching Christ despite motives or results
Divine Sovereignty and Human Will
Jn 6:66After this many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with.Many turn away from Jesus
Rom 9:16So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who...Salvation by God's mercy, not human will
Matt 13:14-15Indeed, in their case the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled that says...Hearts hardened, unwilling to hear
Significance of Departure
1 Jn 2:19They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been...Departure shows they were not true believers

Acts 17 verses

Acts 17 33 Meaning

Acts 17:33 states that after Paul finished speaking, specifically after he had spoken about the resurrection of the dead, some individuals departed from his midst. This verse signifies a mixed response to Paul's gospel message at the Areopagus in Athens, highlighting a clear rejection by some hearers who found the doctrine of resurrection unpalatable or nonsensical, leading them to leave rather than engage further or believe.

Acts 17 33 Context

Acts 17:33 falls immediately after Paul's notable address on the Areopagus in Athens, recorded from verse 22 to 31. Paul, having observed the Athenians' religious devotion, began his discourse by acknowledging their "unknown god." He then shifted to proclaim the true God, the Creator, who does not dwell in temples made by human hands nor needs anything from humanity. He asserted God's sovereignty over all nations, setting their appointed times and boundaries, so that they might seek Him. Paul culminated his sermon by introducing God's command for all people everywhere to repent because He has fixed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by a Man whom He has appointed, having given assurance of this by raising Him from the dead.

Historically, Athens at this time was the intellectual capital of the Roman world, dominated by Epicurean and Stoic philosophers. Epicureans denied divine involvement in human affairs and dismissed a future judgment or resurrection. Stoics, while acknowledging a divine principle, believed in the transmigration of the soul but not a bodily resurrection. Both worldviews were antithetical to the Christian doctrine of a bodily resurrection and a personal, imminent judgment. Paul's message directly confronted these deeply held philosophical positions, especially his assertion of Jesus' bodily resurrection, which was often viewed as folly or utterly impossible by many Greeks. This verse therefore captures the immediate, often negative, reaction of those whose rationalist philosophies were challenged by the supernatural claim of the resurrection.

Acts 17 33 Word analysis

  • Καὶ (kai): "And," "Also," "Even." A conjunction indicating continuation or addition. Here, it signifies the immediate result or transition following Paul's conclusion.
  • οὕτως (houtōs): "Thus," "So," "In this manner." It points to the direct consequence of Paul's preceding words, specifically the doctrine of the resurrection (v. 31), which was the tipping point for many. It suggests the manner of their response.
  • ὁ Παῦλος (ho Paulos): "Paul." The apostle, who was delivering the discourse.
  • ἐξῆλθεν (exēlthen): From exerchomai (ἐξέρχομαι), meaning "he came out," "went forth," or "departed." In this context, it implies Paul himself left. However, due to the following words, it refers to his departure from the presence of some, indicating the conclusion of the public assembly for that group.
  • ἐκ (ek): "Out of," "from." A preposition indicating origin or source.
  • μέσου (mesou): From mesos (μέσος), meaning "middle," "midst." Refers to the location: out from the very center or presence of the gathered crowd.
  • αὐτῶν (autōn): "Their," "them." The pronoun refers to the audience on the Areopagus, specifically those who were uncomfortable or disbelieving concerning the resurrection.
  • οὕτως ὁ Παῦλος ἐξῆλθεν ἐκ μέσου αὐτῶν (houtōs ho Paulos exēlthen ek mesou autōn): "So Paul departed from their midst." This phrase denotes the physical disengagement or dispersal of the assembly from the speaker. It suggests the formal conclusion of the address, with some walking away entirely from Paul's presence due to his message. It marks the moment of division, separating those who were receptive or curious from those who were outright dismissive and chose to leave.

Acts 17 33 Bonus section

The verb exēlthen (departed) for Paul could be interpreted as Paul physically leaving the assembly or the assembly dispersing, but in light of Acts 17:34 ("some men joined him and believed"), it likely means that Paul concluded his speech and was leaving the "midst" of the main group that had gathered. The act of "departing from their midst" implies a clear break in the discussion for this group, an unwillingness to hear more or consider what was said. This outcome resonates with Christ's teaching that many are called but few are chosen, or that the seed falls on different types of soil, producing varying degrees of receptivity, including some falling on hardened ground and bearing no fruit. It emphasizes that human freedom of will plays a part in response to divine truth.

Acts 17 33 Commentary

Acts 17:33 serves as a pivotal moment marking the varied and often predictable human responses to the profound truth of the Gospel. Following Paul's bold proclamation of Jesus' bodily resurrection, the doctrine proved to be a stumbling block for many Athenian intellectuals. For the Epicureans, it was irrational, as they believed the soul dissolved at death. For the Stoics, while perhaps open to a continued existence of the soul, the idea of a bodily resurrection was abhorrent or ludicrous. The departure of "some" signifies their clear rejection; they chose to disengage rather than contemplate the radical claims that challenged their philosophical frameworks and comfortable worldview. This immediate secession demonstrates the divisive nature of the Gospel message, particularly when it confronts entrenched beliefs. It shows that preaching the unadulterated truth will always result in some turning away, illustrating the wisdom of God often appears foolishness to human intellect. Despite this immediate negative response, the verse also subtly sets the stage for the positive responses in the subsequent verse (v. 34), highlighting that God's Word never returns empty, even in intellectual strongholds. It offers a crucial lesson for evangelism: not everyone will accept the truth, especially truths that demand radical changes in perspective and repentance.