2 Chronicles 24 27

2 Chronicles 24:27 kjv

Now concerning his sons, and the greatness of the burdens laid upon him, and the repairing of the house of God, behold, they are written in the story of the book of the kings. And Amaziah his son reigned in his stead.

2 Chronicles 24:27 nkjv

Now concerning his sons, and the many oracles about him, and the repairing of the house of God, indeed they are written in the annals of the book of the kings. Then Amaziah his son reigned in his place.

2 Chronicles 24:27 niv

The account of his sons, the many prophecies about him, and the record of the restoration of the temple of God are written in the annotations on the book of the kings. And Amaziah his son succeeded him as king.

2 Chronicles 24:27 esv

Accounts of his sons and of the many oracles against him and of the rebuilding of the house of God are written in the Story of the Book of the Kings. And Amaziah his son reigned in his place.

2 Chronicles 24:27 nlt

The account of the sons of Joash, the prophecies about him, and the record of his restoration of the Temple of God are written in The Commentary on the Book of the Kings. His son Amaziah became the next king.

2 Chronicles 24 verses

2 Chronicles 24 27 Meaning

This verse serves as a summary conclusion to the reign of King Joash of Judah, stating that the full account of his other deeds, the details concerning his sons, the many prophecies or burdens related to him, and the foundations of the house of God (Temple repairs under his initial good rule), are comprehensively documented. It specifies that these records are found within a work called "the Midrash of the Book of the Kings." The verse highlights the mixed nature of Joash's reign—beginning with Temple restoration, but ultimately leading to apostasy, judgment, and a violent end, all recorded for posterity.

2 Chronicles 24 27 Context

2 Chronicles 24 narrates the reign of Joash, King of Judah. Initially, under the guidance of the High Priest Jehoiada, Joash reigned righteously, leading significant repairs and restoration of the Temple (24:4-14). However, after Jehoiada's death, Joash succumbed to the influence of wicked officials, turned away from the Lord, and persecuted the prophets sent by God. Tragically, he even ordered the stoning of Zechariah, Jehoiada's son, who delivered a prophetic warning from God (24:17-22). This act of shedding innocent blood resulted in divine judgment, as Aram came and devastated Judah, and Joash himself was murdered by his own servants due to his great illness (24:23-26). Verse 27 serves as a final, comprehensive summary statement of Joash's controversial reign, particularly highlighting its concluding, disastrous phase and pointing to extensive historical and prophetic records concerning it. It frames Joash's full story, encapsulating both his early virtue and later tragic apostasy.

2 Chronicles 24 27 Word analysis

• וְדִבְרֵי (ve·diḇ·rê) - And the words/matters/account of: This connective particle "וְ" (ve - "and") links this summary to the previous events, while "דְּבָרִים" (devarim - "words," but also "affairs," "events," or "history") denotes the totality of Joash's remaining acts and life events. It's a comprehensive term.
• בָנָ֤יו (ḇā·nāw) - his sons: Joash is recorded to have had one direct successor, Amaziah. This plural term could refer to:
  • Progeny: Simply acknowledging his lineage or descendants beyond just the immediate successor.
  • Other influential individuals: Members of his family or court that exerted influence, as kings' families often had significant political roles.
  • Unrecorded sons: Biblical accounts do not always list every child, especially if they did not inherit the throne. The mention implies a record of their involvement or fate is available elsewhere.
  • Consequence of his actions: His sin potentially had ramifications for his entire house/line, as was often the case in biblical narratives of dynastic judgment.
• הַרְבֵּה֙ (har·bêh) - many/greatly: Emphasizes the extensiveness or magnitude of what follows—not just a few, but "many" or "great" in number or impact.
• הַֽמַּשְׂאָ֔ (ham·mas·ʾā) - the oracle/burden/prophetic utterance: This is a crucial term, deriving from masa (נָשָׂא), "to lift" or "to carry." In prophetic literature, mas'a often refers to a "burden" or "oracle"—a heavy prophetic pronouncement, often of judgment or significant divine revelation (e.g., Isaiah 13:1, "The oracle concerning Babylon"). Here, it points to the many prophetic messages and judgments (like Zechariah's in 2 Chr 24:20) that concerned or fell upon Joash due to his apostasy. Some interpretations consider mas'a here to mean "wealth" or "tribute," specifically relating to the tribute Joash gave to Aram (2 Chr 24:24), or perhaps the burden of the taxes he collected for the Temple, but the prophetic context within Chronicles strongly favors "oracle/burden."
• וִיסֻדֵי֙ (vî·su·ḏê) - and the foundations/rebuilding of: From yesod (יסוד), meaning "foundation." This directly points back to the positive period of Joash's reign (2 Chr 24:4-14) where he diligently spearheaded the restoration of the Temple, its structure, and its function. Its inclusion here juxtaposes his initial zeal with his later falling away.
• בֵּ֣ית הָאֱלֹהִ֔ים (bêt hā·ʾĕ·lō·hîm) - house of God/Temple: Refers specifically to the Jerusalem Temple, central to Judah's worship and covenant relationship with God. Joash's early success in repairing it was a key highlight of his reign, serving as a stark contrast to his eventual impiety.
• הִנָּ֣ם כְּתוּבִ֗ים (hin·nām kə·ṯū·ḇîm) - behold, they are written: A standard formula used by the Chronicler to confirm the reliability and accessibility of his historical sources. It affirms that the information is recorded and verifiable in authoritative documents.
• עַל־מִדְרַשׁ֙ (ʿal-miḏ·raš) - upon the Midrash/story/exposition of: Midrash (מדרש) is a significant term. While it can broadly mean "story" or "treatise," in Jewish literature, midrash specifically refers to a systematic and often extensive interpretative exposition of biblical text, exploring its meanings and deriving lessons. For the Chronicler, "the Midrash of the Book of the Kings" (or similar phrases like "book of the kings," 2 Chr 16:11, 25:26, etc.) implies that he drew from not merely a chronological record but an interpretative and expanded account of royal history. This suggests a more theologically informed historical source, likely emphasizing divine retribution and covenant loyalty.
• סֵ֤פֶר הַמְּלָכִֽים׃ (sê·p̄er ham·mə·lā·ḵîm.) - the book of the kings: This is a comprehensive royal annal. It's not necessarily the canonical Books of Kings we have today, but refers to larger, authoritative royal chronicles maintained in Judah and Israel, likely including specific narratives and events relevant to the kings' reigns, their alliances, their spiritual standing, and God's interaction with them. The Chronicler frequently cites such works, indicating his reliance on established historical documentation.

Words-Group by words-group analysis:

• "And the account of his sons, the many oracles/burdens": This phrase clusters two key aspects related to Joash's declining reign and its consequences. "His sons" speaks to the future and the legacy of his reign, possibly implying their own acts or the fate of his lineage. The "many oracles/burdens" emphasizes the divine communication—specifically prophecies of judgment or heavy pronouncements (like Zechariah's) that followed his sin. This points to the principle that rejection of God's word brings severe consequences.
• "and the foundations of the house of God— behold, they are written": This section highlights a contrasting element—Joash's initial good deeds related to the Temple's repair. Placing this alongside his negative attributes and their associated prophecies creates a sharp dichotomy. The affirmation "behold, they are written" lends authority and reliability to all these aspects of his reign, positive and negative, as they are part of a divinely overseen historical record.
• "upon the Midrash of the Book of the Kings": This phrase defines the Chronicler's source material and his theological method. The use of "Midrash" indicates he is not merely transcribing but utilizing an interpretative work that likely emphasized the theological implications of events, particularly how the kings' obedience or disobedience led to divine blessing or curse. It points to a layered understanding of history, where factual events are presented with a distinct divine purpose and moral lesson.

2 Chronicles 24 27 Bonus section

The Chronicler's repeated referencing of sources such as "the Book of the Kings of Israel and Judah" or "the Midrash of the Book of the Kings" highlights his theological and literary agenda. Unlike the Books of Kings, which provide a more factual, annalistic history often critical of the kings, the Chronicler revisits this history with a distinct emphasis on divine retribution and reward, the centrality of the Temple, and the legitimacy of the Davidic line. The use of "Midrash" implies that his source was already an interpretive account, allowing him to further expound on the spiritual lessons embedded within the royal narrative. This demonstrates that ancient historians, especially in the biblical context, were not mere chroniclers of events but also theological interpreters, aiming to convey profound spiritual truths to their audience, especially the returning exiles who needed to understand the consequences of past unfaithfulness and the path to restoration. The precision of detail, even when stating that records are elsewhere, underscores the biblical authors' confidence in God's meticulous record-keeping, a theme also present in heavenly "books" (e.g., Ps 56:8).

2 Chronicles 24 27 Commentary

2 Chronicles 24:27 provides a terse, comprehensive epitaph for King Joash, encapsulating the entire arc of his reign. It reveals the Chronicler's methodology, signaling that his concise narrative is drawn from more extensive, authoritative records. The mention of "the account of his sons" (including Amaziah who would succeed him) and "the many oracles" or "burdens" emphasizes the profound divine disapproval that accumulated against Joash, primarily due to his tragic apostasy after Jehoiada's death and his role in the murder of Zechariah. The term mas'a (burden/oracle) strongly hints at prophetic pronouncements of judgment. Juxtaposed with these failures is a brief acknowledgement of "the rebuilding of the house of God"—a positive legacy from his early years, which served as a reminder of his initial faithfulness. This verse reinforces the Chronicler's recurring theological message: kings who neglect God's covenant and His Temple face divine retribution, while those who seek Him are blessed. The historical record serves not just to report facts but to illustrate spiritual principles for future generations.For practical usage, this verse illustrates that:

1. Every act is recorded: Both positive achievements and negative choices are part of an enduring record, whether human or divine (Rev 20:12).
2. Prophetic warnings are weighty: Rejecting God's spoken word through His messengers carries severe spiritual "burdens" or consequences.
3. No legacy is singular: Joash's life had both a "rebuilding" phase and a "judgment" phase, teaching that faithfulness is not a static state but a continual choice.