2 Chronicles 10 19

2 Chronicles 10:19 kjv

And Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this day.

2 Chronicles 10:19 nkjv

So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day.

2 Chronicles 10:19 niv

So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day.

2 Chronicles 10:19 esv

So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day.

2 Chronicles 10:19 nlt

And to this day the northern tribes of Israel have refused to be ruled by a descendant of David.

2 Chronicles 10 verses

2 Chronicles 10 19 Meaning

2 Chronicles 10:19 signifies the definitive and enduring division of the unified Israelite kingdom. It declares that the northern tribes' secession from Rehoboam's rule and the house of David was not a temporary estrangement but a settled state of "rebellion" that persisted into the Chronicler's time. This verse encapsulates the catastrophic outcome of Rehoboam's folly in rejecting wise counsel, leading to the fragmentation of the nation God had established under King David and Solomon. It highlights the lasting consequences of human choices and rebellion against the divinely ordained dynasty.

2 Chronicles 10 19 Context

2 Chronicles 10:19 describes the outcome of a pivotal moment in Israelite history: the division of the united monarchy. Following King Solomon's death, his son Rehoboam ascended the throne in Jerusalem. However, he faced discontent from the northern tribes over Solomon's burdensome labor and taxes. At the assembly in Shechem, representatives of all Israel pleaded for lighter burdens. Rehoboam sought counsel from both his father's wise, elderly advisors and his own young, untested peers. He rejected the counsel of the elders, who advised clemency and service, in favor of his peers' arrogant and harsh advice to increase the burdens. This verse is the summary statement following the northern tribes' outright rejection of Rehoboam's authority (2 Chron 10:16-18) and their declaration, "To your tents, O Israel!" This marked the permanent split, creating the northern kingdom of Israel (under Jeroboam) and the southern kingdom of Judah (remaining with Rehoboam). The Chronicler emphasizes that this rebellion was an established, enduring reality, a fundamental break in the Davidic line's control over the entire nation.

2 Chronicles 10 19 Word analysis

• Thus (וַתִּפְשַׁע - wattiphsha): While literally meaning "so Israel has been in rebellion," the "Thus" often marks a concluding summary statement or outcome of previous events. It serves to transition to the permanent state.
• Israel (יִשְׂרָאֵל - Yisra'el): Refers specifically to the ten northern tribes, distinguishing them from Judah and Benjamin (the two tribes loyal to Rehoboam and the house of David). This usage highlights the fragmentation of the nation.
• has been in rebellion (פָּשַׁע - pasha'): The verb pasha' means to transgress, rebel, revolt, or break away. It implies a deliberate and defiant act against established authority. Here, it denotes a continuous state of insurgency rather than a momentary disagreement, highlighting its permanence.
• against (עַל - al): Indicating opposition and defiance directed toward.
• the house (בֵּית - beit): Literally "house of." It signifies the dynasty, lineage, or family line, not just a physical dwelling.
• of David (דָוִיד - David): Refers to the royal dynasty founded by King David, which God had promised an eternal kingdom (2 Sam 7:16). The rebellion was thus against God's established order and covenant with David.
• to this day (עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה - 'ad hayyom hazzeh): This phrase is a common chronological marker in historical biblical narratives. In the Chronicler's context (writing after the return from exile, much later than the events), it emphasizes the enduring reality of the split throughout centuries. It suggests that the division was not just an event, but a historical fact continuing up to the time of writing, implying that the unified monarchy had never been restored. It also implies the Chronicler's ongoing lament for the lost unity and integrity of God's people.

2 Chronicles 10 19 Bonus section

The Chronicler's focus in narrating the split is primarily on Judah and the Davidic line, reflecting his theological emphasis on the temple, Jerusalem, and the legitimate lineage of kings. While the northern kingdom of Israel is acknowledged, its fate serves mainly as a backdrop against which the story of Judah, which remained faithful to the temple worship, unfolds. The "to this day" statement subtly reminds the post-exilic audience of their lineage tracing back to Judah, while the north remained scattered and lost. It underscores the brokenness from which God's people needed ultimate restoration under a truly righteous descendant of David.

2 Chronicles 10 19 Commentary

2 Chronicles 10:19 delivers a stark summary of a national tragedy rooted in leadership failure and human rebellion. It marks the permanent rupture of the united kingdom of Israel, highlighting Rehoboam's catastrophic choice to disregard wise counsel and choose arrogant authority. The verse directly attributes this separation to "rebellion" against the Davidic house, which, from a theological perspective, was ultimately a rebellion against God's covenantal choice. However, the Chronicler, unlike 1 Kings, subtly interweaves this human rebellion with God's overarching purpose (2 Chron 10:15). Even in human sin and folly, God's divine word and plan prevail. This verse serves as a crucial theological and historical turning point, underscoring the enduring consequences of rejecting divinely appointed wisdom and established authority. It demonstrates that the path of pride and harshness leads to division and disunity, leaving a legacy that persisted for centuries, a poignant reminder for later generations to learn from Israel's history of rebellion.