1 Kings 14:29 kjv
Now the rest of the acts of Rehoboam, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
1 Kings 14:29 nkjv
Now the rest of the acts of Rehoboam, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
1 Kings 14:29 niv
As for the other events of Rehoboam's reign, and all he did, are they not written in the book of the annals of the kings of Judah?
1 Kings 14:29 esv
Now the rest of the acts of Rehoboam and all that he did, are they not written in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah?
1 Kings 14:29 nlt
The rest of the events in Rehoboam's reign and everything he did are recorded in The Book of the History of the Kings of Judah.
1 Kings 14 29 Cross References
| Verse | Text | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Ki 14:19 | Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam... are they not written... | Similar concluding formula for northern kings |
| 1 Ki 15:7 | Now the rest of the acts of Abijam... are they not written... | Concluding formula for Judah's kings |
| 1 Ki 15:23 | The rest of all the acts of Asa... are they not written... | Further details in royal records |
| 1 Ki 16:5 | As for the other events of Omri’s reign... are they not written... | Standard ending for King narratives |
| 2 Chr 12:15 | Now the acts of Rehoboam, first and last, are they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet and Iddo the seer...? | Provides more specific sources for Rehoboam |
| 2 Ki 1:18 | As for the other events of Ahaziah’s reign... are they not written...? | Reinforces reliance on court records |
| 2 Ki 10:34 | As for the other events of Jehu’s reign... are they not written...? | Consistent historical referencing |
| 2 Ki 14:18 | As for the other events of Amaziah’s reign... are they not written...? | Verification of information |
| 2 Ki 15:6 | As for the other events of Azariah’s reign... are they not written...? | Implies deeper historical background |
| 2 Ki 15:36 | As for the other events of Jotham’s reign... are they not written...? | Points to exhaustive, accessible records |
| 2 Ki 16:19 | As for the other events of Ahaz’s reign... are they not written...? | Consistent literary device |
| 2 Ki 20:20 | As for the other events of Hezekiah’s reign... are they not written...? | Historian's integrity and source citation |
| 2 Ki 21:17 | As for the other events of Manasseh’s reign... are they not written...? | Emphasizes selectivity of biblical narrative |
| 2 Ki 21:25 | As for the other events of Amon’s reign... are they not written...? | Routine historical closure |
| 2 Ki 23:28 | As for the other events of Josiah’s reign... are they not written...? | Broad context of king's chronicles |
| 2 Ki 24:5 | As for the other events of Jehoiakim’s reign... are they not written...? | Standard literary structure |
| Est 10:2 | All the powerful and mighty acts of Mordecai, were they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Media and Persia? | Similar archival citation in other books |
| Ps 139:16 | Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them. | Broader concept of divine record-keeping |
| Rev 20:12 | And books were opened. Also another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged... from what was written in the books, according to what they had done. | Ultimate divine chronicles and judgment |
| Dan 7:10 | A thousand thousands served him... the court sat in judgment, and the books were opened. | Divine accounting of deeds |
| Ex 32:32 | But now, if you will forgive their sin—but if not, please blot me out of your book that you have written. | The book of remembrance/life in God's keeping |
| Phil 4:3 | And I ask you, my true companion, help these women... whose names are in the book of life. | Mention of names recorded in God's book |
| Lk 1:1-4 | Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished... just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed good to me... to write an orderly account for you. | Validation of careful, accurate accounts |
1 Kings 14 verses
1 Kings 14 29 Meaning
This verse serves as a concluding statement for the narrative of King Rehoboam's reign in the Book of 1 Kings. It indicates that the comprehensive account of Rehoboam's deeds, beyond what is detailed in 1 Kings, can be found in a specific historical record known as "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah." This phrase affirms the availability of further information while also marking the end of the inspired author's focused account of his kingship.
1 Kings 14 29 Context
1 Kings 14 narrates the latter part of Rehoboam's reign, the first king of Judah after the division of the united monarchy. The chapter details his kingdom's spiritual decline, marked by Judah's building of high places, sacred pillars, and Asherim. This disobedience led to God's judgment through the invasion of Shishak, king of Egypt, who plundered Jerusalem. The account highlights Rehoboam's initial response (humiliation) and the partial withdrawal of God's wrath, yet he ultimately returned to evil practices. Verse 29 is a formulaic summary found throughout 1 and 2 Kings, concluding a king's account and directing the reader to a larger, now lost, official state record for more administrative and military details that the inspired biblical author chose not to include. It places Rehoboam's theological failures within the broader context of historical events, all documented.
1 Kings 14 29 Word analysis
- Now the rest of the acts: (Hebrew: יֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי - yet̄er divrê) This phrase indicates that the biblical account of Rehoboam's reign is not exhaustive. It selectively presents events crucial to its theological message. It implies other historical details exist elsewhere.
- Rehoboam: (Hebrew: רְחַבְעָם - Rĕḥavʿām) Son of Solomon and Naamah the Ammonite. He became king after Solomon's death. His name means "he enlarges the people" or "the people have expanded." Ironically, his harsh rule led to the division of the kingdom.
- and all that he did: (Hebrew: וְכָל־אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה - vəḵāl-ʾăšer ʿāśāh) This inclusive phrase suggests the external "book" contains a full scope of his activities. It contrasts with the selective focus of 1 Kings. The Kings author abstracts information relevant to the divine covenant.
- are they not written: (Hebrew: הֲלֹא־הֵמָּה כְתֻבִים - hălōʾ-hēmmāh kəṯuḇîm) This is a rhetorical question, affirmatively asserting that these additional records are indeed preserved and accessible. It serves to validate the partial history presented in 1 Kings. It assures the audience that the main events are verifiable.
- in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah: (Hebrew: בְּסֵפֶר דִּבְרֵי הַיָּמִים לְמַלְכֵי יְהוּדָה - bə·sê·p̄er div·rê hay·yā·mîm lə·mal·ḵê Yə·hū·ḏāh) This refers to royal court annals or official state records. These were detailed documents maintained by scribes during the reign of each king. Crucially, this is not the canonical Book of Chronicles in the Bible. This distinct source, now lost, provided the Deuteronomistic historian (author of Kings) with much of his factual data. It underlines the historicity of the biblical account, drawing from established, reliable documentation of the time.
1 Kings 14 29 Bonus section
- The recurring phrase in Kings (found for 15 kings of Judah and 17 kings of Israel) functions as an ancient form of footnote or source citation, underscoring the factual basis of the narrative.
- These mentioned "books of the chronicles" are distinct from the biblical books of 1 and 2 Chronicles. The canonical Chronicles often cite other lost sources (e.g., "the book of the kings of Israel," "the commentary on the book of the kings," etc.), indicating a rich historical literary tradition in ancient Israel and Judah.
- The rhetorical question ("are they not written?") implies that the original audience was familiar with or had access to these larger records, lending credibility to the biblical account by allowing for external verification.
- This literary convention also serves to show that the author of Kings consciously chose to not include all details, emphasizing his selective focus on matters of covenant fidelity, prophetic word fulfillment, and the trajectory of the divided monarchy under God's watchful eye.
- The systematic way this formula is applied to both good and evil kings underscores the consistency of historical record-keeping and the unified authorship/editing of the Deuteronomistic History (Joshua-Kings).
1 Kings 14 29 Commentary
1 Kings 14:29 is a key historiographical marker within the Books of Kings, routinely appearing at the conclusion of each king's reign narrative. It points to a larger, secular, state-maintained record. This indicates the biblical author's method of compilation, drawing upon existing royal annals rather than inventing historical details. While these "chronicles of the kings of Judah" (and of Israel for the northern kingdom) likely contained extensive political, military, and administrative data, the author of Kings meticulously selected information that served a theological purpose: to illustrate YHWH's covenant relationship with Israel, His consistent judgment against idolatry, and His faithfulness to His word through the prophets. Thus, the biblical account, though selective, is presented as part of a verifiable historical continuum. It highlights that the Bible's aim is not merely exhaustive historical reporting, but a divinely inspired interpretation of history through the lens of God's interaction with His people. For instance, while the "chronicles" might have detailed Rehoboam's administrative reforms or military campaigns, 1 Kings prioritizes his spiritual failures and their national consequences (1 Ki 14:22-26).