1 Chronicles 9 41

1 Chronicles 9:41 kjv

And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, and Ahaz.

1 Chronicles 9:41 nkjv

The sons of Micah were Pithon, Melech, Tahrea, and Ahaz.

1 Chronicles 9:41 niv

The sons of Micah: Pithon, Melek, Tahrea and Ahaz.

1 Chronicles 9:41 esv

The sons of Micah: Pithon, Melech, Tahrea, and Ahaz.

1 Chronicles 9:41 nlt

The sons of Micah were Pithon, Melech, Tahrea, and Ahaz.

1 Chronicles 9 verses

1 Chronicles 9 41 Meaning

1 Chronicles 9:41 presents a concise genealogical record, stating "and Ahaz begat Jarah; and Jarah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza;". This verse meticulously continues the lineage of King Saul through his great-grandson Ahaz, listing three generations. Its inclusion serves to preserve the historical continuity of the tribes of Israel, particularly Benjamin, highlighting the family lines established before and during the Israelite kingdom. It affirms the precision and importance of genealogies in God's ordered world and for His covenant people.

1 Chronicles 9 41 Context

1 Chronicles chapter 9 primarily lists those who settled in Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile, beginning a comprehensive register of Israel's returned population by tribe. It bridges the genealogical lists of earlier chapters (1-8), which trace the tribes from Adam to the exile, with the detailed narrative of the kings of Judah. Verses 35-44 specifically resume and elaborate on the genealogy of Saul, a distinct royal line from the dominant Davidic one that follows. This provides a historical continuity for Saul's descendants who returned to Jerusalem. The Chronicler's primary audience, the post-exilic community, found identity and assurance in these detailed family records, reminding them of their heritage, divine promises, and continued existence as God's people, despite their tumultuous history. Including Saul's lineage, even briefly, situates his historical role within the larger narrative of Israel's leadership before David's reign.

1 Chronicles 9 41 Word analysis

• And: (Hebrew: וְ - ve) A simple conjunction connecting this verse to the preceding genealogical flow. It emphasizes continuity and progression in the lineage being recorded.
• Ahaz: (Hebrew: אָחָז - ʼAḥaz) A proper noun, identified here as an ancestor of Saul. The name generally means "he has grasped" or "possessor." While an ancestor of Saul's line, he should not be confused with King Ahaz of Judah. This highlights the existence of different individuals sharing the same name. His mention here connects directly to 1 Chron 8:36.
• Begat: (Hebrew: יָלַד - yalad) This verb is used repeatedly, emphasizing direct, generational descent. It signifies a continuous, biological link, crucial for establishing tribal and familial identities, as well as rightful inheritance in ancient Israelite society. The repeated use highlights the chronological flow and preservation of the lineage.
• Jarah: (Hebrew: יַעֲרָה - Yaʿarah) A proper noun, a son of Ahaz. This name means "honeycomb" or "forest." In the parallel list in 1 Chr 8:36, the name is given as Jehoadah (יְהוֹעַדָּה - Yehoʿaddah), meaning "the Lord has adorned" or "Jehovah is adorned." This discrepancy highlights potential scribal variations, alternative names for the same person, or different genealogical branches, a common feature in ancient records that do not negate the overall intent of providing lineage.
• Alemeth: (Hebrew: עָלֶמֶת - ʿAlemet) A proper noun, a son of Jarah. The name means "covering" or "concealing." It marks one of Jarah's three children mentioned.
• Azmaveth: (Hebrew: עַזְמָוֶת - ʿAzmaveth) A proper noun, a son of Jarah. The name means "strong one of death." This is also the name of a place and other individuals in the Old Testament, but here it refers specifically to Jarah's son.
• Zimri: (Hebrew: זִמְרִי - Zimri) A proper noun, a son of Jarah. The name means "my music" or "my protection." This individual then begat Moza.
• Moza: (Hebrew: מוֹצָא - Motzaʼ) A proper noun, a son of Zimri. The name means "going forth" or "origin." He is the final descendant mentioned in this particular part of Saul's genealogy within the verse.

Words-group analysis:

• Ahaz begat Jarah;: This establishes the initial generational link. It ties into the broader Benjaminite lineage described earlier in Chapter 8 and further clarifies the descendants of King Saul. The identity of "Ahaz" connects to other parts of this extended genealogy, highlighting the careful compilation of records.
• and Jarah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri;: This indicates Jarah had multiple sons. The Chronicler's choice to list these specific three (Alemeth, Azmaveth, and Zimri) implies their significance within the family line, perhaps as progenitors of specific branches or their relevance to the post-exilic community.
• and Zimri begat Moza;: This concludes the specific line within the verse, continuing the chronological progression through a chosen branch of the family. The repetition of "begat" ensures clarity in the direct line of succession for this branch. This detailed progression is typical of biblical genealogies, providing a precise record of generational flow.

1 Chronicles 9 41 Bonus section

The genealogical records in 1 Chronicles, including this verse, are not just passive lists; they are active theological statements. By carefully preserving these names and connections, the Chronicler emphasizes God's faithfulness in sustaining His covenant people across generations, despite periods of disobedience, exile, and seeming disarray. The preservation of such seemingly minor details, like the descendants of Saul, underscores that every part of Israel's past contributes to the larger narrative of God's interaction with His chosen people. The minor variations between genealogical lists (e.g., between 1 Chron 8 and 9) do not negate their truthfulness but reflect ancient record-keeping practices, where emphasis, adopted names, or differing source materials could lead to slight divergences without undermining the primary goal of establishing a line of descent. These genealogies are a testament to the fact that every generation is important in God's eyes and part of a larger, divinely orchestrated story.

1 Chronicles 9 41 Commentary

1 Chronicles 9:41, a brief but critical genealogical snippet, seamlessly continues the detailed lineage of Saul's family line for the post-exilic community. In an era when identity and heritage were paramount, the Chronicler painstakingly recorded these genealogies, not merely as dry historical facts but as foundational truths. For the returning exiles, this verse, like others in these chapters, served several purposes: it reaffirmed their belonging to the covenant people of Israel, established their legitimate claim to their tribal lands, and offered a tangible connection to their past, especially to figures like Saul.

The specific inclusion of Saul's lineage, despite the Chronicler's general focus on the Davidic kingship, underscores a commitment to complete historical record-keeping for the tribe of Benjamin and an understanding of Israel's royal history from its inception. The careful listing of "Ahaz begat Jarah; and Jarah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza" demonstrates a meticulous effort to trace even the branches that did not lead to the Messiah, recognizing every part of God's people as valuable in His overarching plan. While seemingly just a list of names, this verse, embedded within a larger context of God's people settling back into the land, reminds us that divine sovereignty works through successive generations and maintains a historical thread through all of Israel's experiences, preserving continuity even through times of scattering and return.