1 Chronicles 6 25

1 Chronicles 6:25 kjv

And the sons of Elkanah; Amasai, and Ahimoth.

1 Chronicles 6:25 nkjv

The sons of Elkanah were Amasai and Ahimoth.

1 Chronicles 6:25 niv

The descendants of Elkanah: Amasai, Ahimoth,

1 Chronicles 6:25 esv

The sons of Elkanah: Amasai and Ahimoth,

1 Chronicles 6:25 nlt

The descendants of Elkanah included Amasai, Ahimoth,

1 Chronicles 6 verses

1 Chronicles 6 25 Meaning

1 Chronicles 6:25 records two names, Amasai and Ahimoth, as sons of Elkanah within the intricate lineage of the Kohathite Levites. This verse is a segment of the extended genealogies presented by the Chronicler, emphasizing the structured order and continuity of the priestly and Levitical families, particularly those ordained for service in the tabernacle and later, the Temple. It underscores the divine preservation of specific lineages crucial for maintaining the integrity of worship and covenantal responsibilities within Israel.

1 Chronicles 6 25 Context

1 Chronicles chapter 6 primarily focuses on the extensive genealogies of the Levites, who were designated for religious service in Israel. Following the genealogies of Levi's three sons—Gershon, Kohath, and Merari (1 Chr 6:1-19)—the text meticulously details the lineage of Kohath. This section is particularly important as the priestly line of Aaron (from Amram, son of Kohath) emerges from it. Verses 22-28 continue to trace various Kohathite family branches. 1 Chronicles 6:25 is specifically a very concise point within this extended list, identifying "Amasai" and "Ahimoth" as sons of an Elkanah. This Elkanah is likely a descendant in the complex Kohathite family tree (potentially the Elkanah mentioned in 1 Chr 6:24, or a later one depending on the exact branching point), separate from Elkanah, the father of Samuel (though Samuel’s line is also traced within this chapter starting from v. 33). The historical context for the Chronicler's audience, largely post-exilic Judah, made such precise genealogical records vital for re-establishing legitimate worship and defining roles in the reconstructed Temple and community.

1 Chronicles 6 25 Word analysis

• And (וְ, ve-): This common Hebrew conjunction links the new information about Elkanah's sons to the preceding genealogical list, signifying continuity and addition within the family tree.
• the sons (בְּנֵי, beney): This plural construct noun ("sons of") explicitly designates male offspring, highlighting the patriarchal nature of biblical lineage. In genealogical records, it ensures the clear succession and identity within family units. The emphasis on male heirs was paramount for the continuity of family names, inheritances, and particularly in Israel, the transmission of covenant responsibilities and tribal affiliations, especially for priestly and Levitical service.
• of Elkanah (אֶלְקָנָה, Elqanah): A common Hebrew name meaning "God has created" or "God has acquired." The prevalence of this name within the Levite tribe necessitates context to identify the specific individual. In 1 Chronicles 6, there are multiple Elkanahs. This specific Elkanah serves as a nodal point in the Kohathite lineage, linking two branches together for a specific enumeration within the vast Levite family. The Chronicler’s meticulous detailing suggests a historical interest in connecting current Levitical groups to their ancient ancestors.
• Amasai (עֲמָשַׂי, ʻAmasay): The first son listed, whose name means "my burden" or "bearer of burdens," perhaps implying a role of responsibility. While other Amasais are mentioned (e.g., a leader among David's mighty men in 1 Chr 12:18, or a priest in 2 Chr 31:15), this particular Amasai's primary significance is his position in this genealogical link. His inclusion affirms the thoroughness of the genealogical record and the continuous nature of God’s covenant with families.
• and Ahimoth (אֲחִימוֹת, ʻAḥimowth): The second son. The name means "brother of death" or "my brother is death," which, like some ancient names, can have various nuanced interpretations not necessarily negative (e.g., related to enduring strength, or the fragility of life under divine hand). Ahimoth is very rarely mentioned in other biblical texts outside of similar genealogical contexts (cf. 1 Chr 6:35, as a link in another, longer listing which may trace a parallel or overlapping branch). His presence, though seemingly minor, completes this segment of the family tree, validating the historical transmission of the lineage.

1 Chronicles 6 25 Bonus section

The extensive genealogies in Chronicles (chs. 1-9), of which 1 Chronicles 6:25 is a minute part, highlight the Chronicler's strong theological agenda. They are not merely historical records but polemical and didactic tools. By meticulously detailing the unbroken lines of priests and Levites, the Chronicler reinforces the legitimacy and continuity of the true worship in Jerusalem following the Babylonian exile, often implicitly or explicitly countering any claims from those with unverified or non-Israelite ancestry to positions of religious authority. The specific identification of names like Amasai and Ahimoth within this elaborate family tree reaffirms the divinely ordained structure of Israelite society and cultic practices, connecting the present post-exilic community directly to their covenant roots. These detailed lists were crucial for practical purposes, too: ensuring tribal land allocations, proper priestly and Levitical duties, and establishing legal and social identity in the reconstituted community. The common occurrence of names like "Elkanah" throughout the Levite genealogies illustrates how names were reused across generations, emphasizing familial continuity while also necessitating precise lineal tracing to avoid confusion.

1 Chronicles 6 25 Commentary

1 Chronicles 6:25 is a snapshot within the extensive genealogical record of the Levites, serving a critical purpose for the Chronicler and his post-exilic audience. Its seemingly simple list of names—Elkanah, Amasai, and Ahimoth—is laden with theological and historical significance. These genealogies are not mere rosters but attestations of God's covenant faithfulness and meticulous order. They validate the legitimacy of the priestly and Levitical families, who were tasked with maintaining sacred worship, teaching the law, and performing tabernacle/temple duties. The detailed listing, even of less prominent individuals like Amasai and Ahimoth, demonstrates that God's plan encompassed specific families for specific roles throughout generations. For the returning exiles, this established their identity, their continuity with ancient Israel, and the basis for re-establishing God's divinely appointed religious services in their land. It underscores that membership and office within God's chosen people were not arbitrary but divinely preserved through ancestral lines, pointing to the unchanging nature of His covenants. This divine preservation assures the Israelites of their rightful heritage and the unbroken line of sacred service.